Category Archives: People

Big makers must deliver the regional message

Terroir’, or a sense of place, is the vocabulary of the fine-wine world. It’s the language of regions, their climates and soils and the grapes that work best in particular circumstances. The wine drinker’s fascination with origin progresses to the peculiarities of individual vineyards sites and the subtle differences of wines from various locations within a region.

Australia’s has ‘terroirs’ galore, manifested by the tremendous spread of our more than two thousand small vignerons and legion of independent grape growers. But in our conquest of world markets we’ve limited our vocabulary largely to a generic sunshine-in-a-bottle, multi-region-blend message.

This promises a base for our next round of expansion as we take our regional stories to the world. To achieve this, however, our big winemakers – those leading the current, but faltering, export success – must embrace the ‘terroir’ concept – not just mouth it, but comprehend it and take it to the world.

They don’t need to use the French term ‘terroir’ – and perhaps may better off without it even though we don’t have a comparable English word. But what it sums up for Australia is our tremendously varied regional and intra-regional wine stories, some just a few decades in the making, others stretching back to the mid nineteenth century.

The concept underpins all of our successful small makers and many of our locally successful big company upmarket brands – for example, the Foster’s-owned Wynns of Coonawarra. Indeed, for Australian wine drinkers the name Wynns, Coonawarra and cabernet sauvignon are indistinguishable – making Wynns a model of a wine brand, intimately linked to its region and the region’s varietal specialty.

The link exists not through slick marketing but through the Wynns wines enjoyed by Australians for almost sixty years ¬– what’s in the glass tells the Coonawarra story.

But after Australia’s decade of export success, the story of this fifty-eight-year-old brand remains little known outside Australia, even in our biggest export markets, the UK and USA. In the latter, said winemaker Sue Hodder in Canberra last week, the trade accepts Wynns shiraz because shiraz is seen as Australia’s special variety, but rejects Wynns cabernet, partly because it upstages American cabernets in Foster’s portfolio.

Meanwhile back in Australia the Wynns regional story moved on to individual vineyards earlier this decade – reflecting the fact that even in a flat, apparently homogenous region like Coonawarra, quality and shades of flavour vary widely, even over short distances.

The focus began in earnest after the disastrous 2002 vintage says Hodder.  A vineyard rejuvenation project, already being led by Allen Jenkins, gathered pace across Wynns vast holdings, spread across Coonawarra.

Allen worked closely with Sue, monitoring grape quality, and ultimately wine style and quality, across scores of blocks and even rows of vines within blocks.

The first individual vineyard wine that I recall from the project was Wynns ‘Harold’ Cabernet Sauvignon 2001, sourced from a nine-hectare block purchased by Wynns from Harold Childs in 1966 and replanted to cabernet in 1971. The block sits about half way between Coonawarra village and Penola on the northwestern corner of the Riddoch Highway (dissecting Coonawarra north to south) and Stony Road. You can see the vineyard by searching ‘Stony Road Coonawarra’ on Google Earth.

Eight years on Harold 2001 looks young, with a beautiful floral lift to the varietal aroma and a fresh, supple, elegant ripe-berry palate. It’s a delight to drink and quite distinctive in the Wynns line-up, albeit in the Coonawarra family mould.

What a contrast Harold presents to Wynns ‘Messenger’ Cabernet Sauvignon 2005. This is a fuller, riper, earthier style (still very much Coonawarra cabernet) from a 3.3-hectare vineyard planted in 1975 on what would’ve then been Coonawarra’s southwestern fringe. Apparently the block performs well in warm years like 2005.

In another different vein Wynns ‘Johnson’s’ Shiraz Cabernet 2003 presents a round, soft palate (thanks to the shiraz) with bright, fresh, red-berry flavours. Sue says the block always delivers these distinctive flavours in both cabernet and shiraz. The block’s cultivated history stretches back to the 1890s. Wynns acquired it in 1951 as part of their original purchase. Today it has 32 hectares of shiraz, planted in 1925, and 19 hectares of cabernet sauvignon, planted in 1954.

And from the ‘Alex’ block, located one kilometre north of the Wynns winery, comes a new cabernet from the 2006 vintage. It’s very deep and ripe with rich, supple, clearly varietal palate – an open, appealing style and a pleasure to drink now. It’s from a block acquired by James Alexander in 1892, bought by Wynns in 1982 and planted to grapes in 1988.

These single vineyard wines present some of the colour and shade of Coonawarra, variations based partly on quantifiable climate differences (Coonawarra’s flat but grapes ripen almost two weeks later in southern Coonawarra than they do just 15–20 kilometres north) and partly to less quantifiable factors like variation in soil types. And that’s overimplifying what’s behind the fascinating flavour difference.

The single site wines add spice to the core range which has also benefited from a decade of vineyard rejuvenation. The just released shiraz 2008 presents a beautifully fragrant, vibrant, elegant face of Coonawarra shiraz – medium bodied, spicy, supple and with cellaring potential, despite its drink-now appeal.

Good old black label cabernet 2007, made in tiny volumes thanks to frost and drought, is elegant, refined and pure in its varietal character. Its bigger brother, John Riddoch 2006, is all power and grace – a beautifully aromatic cabernet of great intensity and harmony.

These are all wines that tell their own regional story. They’re graceful, delicious and varied but have a regional stamp. There’s no marketing artifice, just an honest story of the land, the vines and the people tending the vines and making the wines. The evolving story is best told directly by winemaker Sue Hodder and viticulturist Allen Jenkinson. The role of the marketers is to understand this story and help Sue and Allen pass it on to wine drinkers. It isn’t like marketing fast moving consumer goods or even like marketing big beer brands. They’re different worlds and we live in hope that Foster’s might grasp it and take some of our greatest wine names to the world.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2009

Canberra’s truffled beer

The black perigord truffle (tuber melanosporum) boosts the aromas and flavours of other foods, at least partly through absorption of its penetrating, seductive aroma in fat – dramatically so in the case of eggs and cheese. But would it work its magic, I wondered, in the truffle beer about to flow at the Wig & Pen?

A week later, after a couple of small-scale trials, brewer Richard Watkins pulled the first pints just hours after adding truffle slices to the Wig’s Modus Hoperandus – a metal reinforced glass percolator, built originally for fresh hops flowers, and now perched permanently on the bar.

After the hops season Richard created Spies’d Olde Ale, a 5.8 per cent alcohol, mild, malty brew to seep through a changing feast of fresh spices – including vanilla beans, cinnamon, cardamon, nutmeg and juniper – on the way to the taps.

As the spice influence waned, Richard added thick slices of fresh local truffle and detected its influence almost immediately – as a strong boost to the ale’s molasses and brown sugar flavours.

I hadn’t tried the ale beforehand, but the post-truffle brew impressed for its wine-like richness. And as it warmed in the glass there was a definite truffle note mingled with the hops aftertaste – perhaps extracted by the hop oils or alcohol, or both. Richard hopes to serve the beer for the duration of the local truffle season.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2009

Winewise awards — a view from the judge’s bench

A recent database published by Winetitles, Adelaide, lists 2320 Australian vignerons, mostly small and sprinkled across southern Australia. As a judge at the recent Winewise Small Vignerons Awards, I was struck by the diversity of styles and high quality now offered by these small makers.

Indeed we judged at such a leisurely pace (for a wine show) that I had time to make detailed notes of the 236 wines assessed by my panel over the two and a half days of the event. It’s therefore only a snapshot as four other panels assessed another 1,200 wines. You can read the honour roll of medal and trophy winners at www.winewise.net.au, so what I offer here is my own list of wines that’ll put a smile on your face. There’s a general correlation with the aggregate results. But a great joy of wine is that even judges disagree about what tastes best.

Riesling
We found plenty to love in rieslings from across the continent. McLean’s Farmgate 2008 Eden Valley (owner Bob McLean, winemaker Colin Forbes) pleased for its fresh limey flavours and taut delicate structure ¬– a contrast to the fatter and softer but still delicious Neagles Rock Clare Valley 2008.

A run of lovely 2008s from much cooler areas showed the finer, more delicate and sometimes steely acidic face of the variety. Favourites were: Allinda Yarra Valley, Wild Dog Gippsland, Goaty Hill Tamar Tasmania, Greystone Waipara New Zealand and Bream Creek South Eastern Tasmania.

From the Canberra district Nick O’Leary 2008, Helm Classic 2008 and especially Helm Premium 2008 showed real finesse, alongside the understated Zarapeth Porongorup 2008 and delicate, musky Granite Hills Macedon Ranges 2008.

And in a line-up from various vintages and regions these wines appealed: Morningside Tasmania 2007, Koonara Sofiel’s Gift Adelaide Hills 2007, Setanta Speckled Hen Adelaide Hills 2007, Patrick T Wrattonbully 2006, Delatite Mansfield 2006, Tertini Southern Highlands 2005 and Pokolbin Estate Hunter 2004.

Chardonnay
After tasting such fresh, bright, complex chardonnays I wonder why the popular fascination with sauvignon blanc, a vastly inferior variety to my taste. Geoff Weaver Lenswood 2008 and Protero Gumeracha 2007, from the Adelaide Hills, and Bream Creek from Tasmania showed various shades of cool-grown chardonnay – the Bream Creek, in particular real flavour intensity with delicacy.

Balgownie’s Yarra Valley 2006 was the sole but rich and complex star of a run of so-so central Victorian chardonnays – how a Yarra got in there I don’t know, but it saved the day!

Chardonnay showed its adaptability in several really delicious wines from a mixed-region class covering warm and cool climates. Canberra’s Mount Majura 2008 topped my list with its fine, balanced understated style. But Spring Ridge Cowra 2006 appealed too for its deep fruit and complex, leesy flavours. Three wines from Mulyan Vineyards Cowra showed great textural and flavour qualities – Mulyan Bushranger Bounty 2007, Cowra 2006 and Block 7 2006. Lerida Estate Canberra 2007 showed well, too, offering grapefruit-like varietal flavour fleshed out by very good oak treatment.

Viognier
The variety’s distinctive apricot-like flavour and sometimes-oily texture can be too much. But in a field of 27 wines our unanimous favourite was Heafod Glen Swan Valley 2008, an incredibly zesty, complex, fine example of the variety. Not far behind was Canberra’s Ravensworth 2008, offering pure ginger and spice varietal flavour and the rich texture of barrel fermentation and maturation. I also liked the silky smooth, slightly fatter Barossa Valley version of Ishtar 2008.

Semillon sauvignon blanc blends
We trawled through 30 wines and finally found a little excitement in Otway Estate Western Victoria 2008, Bellbrae Estate Geelong 2008 and Wine by Brad Margaret River 2008. This blend has been swept along in the sauvignon blanc craze and can be complex and satisfying – but alas, mediocrity dominates.

Hunter shiraz
This 2007 vintage class proved to be the highlight of the judging for me. It was a good vintage. Combine that with mature vines, mature winemaking skills and a regional tendency towards gentle, restrained styles and you get glass after glass of pure pleasure.

My favourites in more-or-less order of preference were: Di Iuliis Limited Release, Capercaille Ghillie Shiraz, Thomas Wines DJV Shiraz, Wandin Valley Estate Bridie’s Reserve Shiraz, Pokolbin Estate Shiraz Viognier, Ernest Hill William Henry, David Hook Old Vines.

A bracket of older Hunter shiraz also yielded several gentle, lovable gems: Capercaille Ghillie 2005, Saddlers Creek Single Vineyard 2005, Pokolbin Estate Reserve 2003, Ridgeview Wines 2006, Mistletoe Reserve 2006 and Ridgeview Wines Generations Reserve 2006.

Other shiraz
A mixed class threw up one delightful surprise – the peppery, spicy and supple, fine boned Golden Grove Estate 2008 from Queensland’s Granite belt.

The central Victoria shiraz class suggested that shiraz isn’t a universal champ in the region. There were several lean, unripe wines and several very faulty ones. However, three Bendigo wines – Sheer Drop 2004 (magnificent), Balgownie Estate 2006 and Balgownie Black Label Bendigo-Grampians2008  – and one Grampians wine, Hyde Park The Pinnacle 2007, saved the area’s reputation.

Cabernet sauvignon
Our panel tasted only 15 of the many cabernets exhibited but there was only one that really took my fancy – the supple, elegant Lost Lake Barrel Selection Single Vineyard 2007 from Pemberton, Western Australia.

Rhone blends – grenache, shiraz, mourvedre (aka Mataro)
This was another delicious line-up of a style that our warm areas do very, very well. We have the winemaking tradition, mature vines and a small army of enthusiastic young winemakers focusing on every detail – especially on fruit selection from great old vineyards.

Two contrasting wines that won my palate were the deep, dense, firm, beautifully grippy Murray Street Vineyards The Barossa Shiraz Mataro Grenache 2007 and the fragrant, supple spicy B3 Barossa Valley Grenache Shiraz Mourvedre 2007. The style differences were easy to detect and attribute to a dominance of mataro in the firmer wine and grenache in the lighter style. Bloody delicious.

I also loved the spicy, elegant, peppery Ishtar Barossa Grenache Shiraz Mourvedre 2006, Halifax Ad Lib McLaren Vale Grenache Shiraz Cabernet 2006 and Hentley Farm Dirty Bliss Grenache Shiraz.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2009

Australasian bulls eye in Chardonnay shoot out

On a recent blustery Friday afternoon, Canberra hosted an international chardonnay shoot-out. The bullets may ricochet around the world for some time. While the event may never take on the legendary status of Steven Spurrier’s 1976 judgement of Paris – where a handful of Californian wines out gunned some of France’s best – the Canberra tasting is sure to upset more winemakers than it pleases.

On this occasion, the biggest losers were the American wines, stuck, it seems, in a winemaking style that Australian makers tried then abandoned 20 years ago. While the French fared better, their schadenfreude will be quickly transferred to the victorious Australians and New Zealanders.

On the aggregate scores of 16 judges (I was one) Australasian wines took nine of the top ten spots, with a French wine rated ninth. The five American chardonnays occupied five of the last six positions in the field of twenty.

So, what were the wines, how did they fare individually, who were the judges, and what do the results mean?

The tasting, conducted during Winewise magazine’s annual Small Vignerons Awards, included five chardonnays each from France, the United States, New Zealand and Australia. The wines were served blind – all we saw as judges was 20 glasses of wine in front of each of us. We knew they were top examples of 2005s and 2006s, five each from the four countries. We didn’t know the serving order.

The judges were mainly Australians with a couple of expat New Zealanders, but no Americans or French (one of the big upsets in the 1976 Spurrier tasting was the inclusion of influential French tasters).

However, the panel, including wine show veterans James Halliday and Ian McKenzie, had a great depth of international experience.

As a group we appreciated and enjoyed top French, New Zealand and Australian wines. But it would also be fair to say we felt some scepticism towards American chardonnays, albeit based on experience. To that extent the tasting confirmed our fears about the American wines.

We tasted the wines without discussion (it’s so easy to be influenced by someone else’s comments), awarding each wine a score out of 20 in half point increments. In the show system we give bronze medals to wines scoring 15.5, 16 or 16.5; silver medals for scores of 17.0, 17.5 or 18.0; and gold medals for scores above 18.5.

For this tasting I thought less of medal scores (because we weren’t awarding medals) and more along the line that scores should reflect the range of quality in front of us. And it turned out to be wider than I’d expected, ranging my notes from 19.5 for the glorious Coldstream Hills Reserve Yarra Valley Chardonnay 2006 to 12 for the cloudy, out of condition Kistler Dutton Ranch Russian River Valley Chardonnay 2005.

Now, as Hugh Johnson once said, giving wines scores can create a spurious sense of precision. And when we look across the scores of 22 people tasting 20 chardonnays the range of individual scores on any one wine is pretty wide. The scores for the group’s top ranking wine (Coldstream Reserve 2006), for example, ranged from 16.5 to 19.5 – a 15 per cent variance. But nine of the 16 judges and one of the associate judges rated it 19 or above; and four judges and four associates scored it at 18.5. Clearly it pushed the right buttons for most tasters. But there were dissenters.

The official scorecard, when Winewise publishes it, will show our aggregates and averages – fair enough for getting the general drift, but hiding the quite wide range of opinions on each wine. The group’s wooden spooner, for example, averaged 15.5 points but one taster gave it 18.5 ¬– a gold medal score. Its scores ranged from 13 to 18.5 points.

One thing that I took away from the tasting is how difficult it would have been to nominate the country of origin of most of the wines – something I think many of the experienced tasters on the panel could’ve have done with ease twenty years ago.

I attribute this to the amazing quality advances by Australian and New Zealand wines over that period. Both countries have experienced a great finessing of chardonnays achieved through attentive winemaking and viticultural management, including the expansion and maturing of vines in the right regions.

While Australia’s and New Zealand’s winemakers steadily closed the quality gap with France – indeed blurred the boundary between great Burgundy and home-grown stuff – American chardonnay, if what we tasted was indeed a representative sample, seems to have stayed in the over-oaked, heavy styles that we made in the eighties.

Another great competitive advantage we have over the French is our embrace of the screw cap. Our wines were bright and fresh, but a couple of the French wines in the line up seemed a little dull, perhaps the result of oxidation caused by a poor cork.

While in my books the Coldstream Hills Reserve 2006 stood above the pack, I’ve grouped my own ratings into four categories – A grade, Reserve grade, Reserve grade reserves and Thanks for coming.

A grade
Coldstream Hills Reserve Yarra Valley 2006, Cloudy Bay Marlborough 2006, Voyager Estate Margaret River 2006, Leeuwin Estate Margaret River 2006, Chevalier-Montrachet Les Demoiselles (Louis Jadot) 2005, Giaconda Beechworth 2006, Ata Rangi Craighall 2006, Meursault Les Perrieres (Pierre Morey) 2006.

Reserve grade
Kumeu River Coddington 2006, Batard-Montrachet (Leflaive) 2006, Craggy Range Gimblett Gravels 2006, Bindi Quartz 2005

Reserve grade reserves
Kansgaard Napa 2006, Church Road Tom 2006, Chablis Grenoilles (Louis Michel) 2006, Corton-Charlemagne (Marc Colin) 2005

Thanks for coming
Mount Eden Estate 2005, Peter Michael Winery Ma Belle Fille Eastern Sonoma 2006, Kenwood Family Vineyards Tor Sonoma County 2005, Kistler Dutton Ranch Russian River Valley 2005.
Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2009

Truffle ahead for Australia’s wine industry

We may never hear an Australian prime minister saying ‘fair sniff of the truffle mate’. But in the Canberra region truffles are already a highly visible seasonal luxury, with more action to come when recent local plantings bear fruit.

At a grower seminar during the recent truffle festival, local producer Wayne Haslam said that 30 growers between the southern highlands and the snow country now tend 16 thousand trees. This suggests an annual crop of about 1,500 kg, worth around $2 million to the growers and about $3.75 million retail.

We could easily see that as a drop in the vast food retail market. But with truffles retailing at around $125 for 50gms during the June–July season, it’s clearly a highly specialised niche – and a brand new one at that, having started locally only this decade.

Truffle’s mystique lies in its unique, sensuous, penetrating aroma rather than its high price (a function of scarcity) and its ability to boost the flavour of foods, especially fatty products.

Once you’ve gone nose to nose with a good fresh truffle, you’ll always want to try it one more time. And in Canberra probably some of the keenest converts are also our keenest wine drinkers – to the extent that there will inevitably be links between our winemakers and truffle growers.

Several local winemakers have organised truffle dinners in the last two seasons – exploring the truffle’s possibilities with food as well as potential wine pairings.

It’s only a matter of time, I reckon, before we see Canberra vignerons planting truffle-infected trees – typically English oak and hazelnut – for either personal or commercial reasons.

I know of one Murrumbateman winemaker with a personal truffiere already marked out. And Frank van der Loo, of Mount Majura vineyard, tells me the investors behind the vineyard considered truffles some years back, but shied away from the risk at the time.

The next-door neighbour subsequently planted a truffiere and harvested the first crop just three years later. Frank sees potential to bring wine and truffles together, perhaps at cellar door – and who knows, maybe a Mount Majura Vineyard plantation?

There’s a precedent in The Wine & Truffle Company, Western Australia. At the Canberra forum a two weeks ago, Alf Salter, a director, said that the cellar door, located at Manjimup, to the south east of Margaret River, attracted five thousand visitors a year – an impressive feat for such an isolated location.

Alf reckons that the venture will harvest about a tonne to 1.2 tonnes this year, after yields of 600 kg in 2008 and 300 kg in 2007 – the rapid increase reflecting more trees coming into production.

But he cautions against truffle growing without deep pockets and careful planning. There’s a considerable upfront investment (about $30 thousand to the hectare), considerable maintenance of the truffiere, a long wait until full production and, as well, growers face all the risks of any agricultural venture.

He said that planting vines as well as truffles had meant an earlier cash flow for the new business – as vines yielded saleable fruit after four years, but truffles didn’t produce income until eight years after planting. Ultimately, though, the combination is what attracts so many visitors to the cellar door.

Another note of caution for would-be truffle growers, Alf said, was the potential risk of flooding the Australian market and reducing returns to growers.  Australian truffle growers produced 800 kg in 2007 and one point four tonnes in 2008. And they are projected to produce two tonnes this year and five tonnes by 2015.

From a consumer perspective, we can only welcome a little over production if it makes truffles more affordable. What’s to stop the price of high-quality truffles declining if growers can learn to produce them efficiently?

My limited experience with truffles is that we need a decent slab if we’re to share the pleasure over a meal with friends – be it simple, but gloriously scented truffled eggs for brekky, served with a delicate Buddha’s Tears tea, or a multi-course truffle menu accompanied by a sequence of great wines.

The exciting thing though is that they’re now on Canberra’s menu and likely to be available in greater quantities in the years ahead. You can buy them direct from producers at the EPIC markets on Saturday mornings (be very early). And the more adventurous local restaurateurs are offering truffle menus.

If you’re buying, my advice from limited experience, is that all truffles are not created equal and that freshness (measured in days from harvest, not weeks, is essential). Simply trust your nose – pick the little bugger up and sniff it. If it’s on the money, you’ll know, believe me. And you’ll never forget that first moment.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2009

Aussie, French, US and Chilean cabernets reviewed

While shiraz and chardonnay slug it out for top spot (we produced 436 thousand and 445 thousand tonnes respectively in 2008), cabernet holds confidently to its less publicised third position at 254 thousand tonnes.

Like shiraz, it works in a variety of regions, if not as easily, producing robust, pleasing flavours – albeit with a boost, on occasion, through the addition of shiraz, merlot, malbec or petit verdot.

Like shiraz, it’s a variety that performs across price points from wine casks, to function wines to wines that can hold their own in any company in the world.

This is a review of some that’ve drifted across the Chateau Shanahan tasting bench recently.

Majella The Musician Coonawarra Cabernet Shiraz 2008 $18
Prof and Tony Lynn’s Musician gives elegance a good name. It’s sourced entirely from the Lynn’s southern Coonawarra vineyard and made specifically for early drinking. It captures Coonawarra’s bright, magic berry aromas and flavours. And though it’s soft and easy to drink, it still has the structure of a real red. The sensational 2007 is still available around town, but we can move onto the vibrant 2008 with equal confidence when the 2007 sells out. I rate this as my top Australian red under $20.

Knappstein Clare Valley Enterprise Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon 2006 $42
Alas, the musty, mouldy reek of cork taint ruined a wine that, on reputation, should’ve been superb. We could be generous to the winemakers and say, oh dear, what bad luck. But realistically, guys, you make your own luck with seals these days. How about a screw cap next vintage?

Balnaves Coonawarra ‘The Tally’ 2007 $90
This one cuts the mustard in any company – a deep and powerful but elegant red built for long cellaring. It’s from two of Doug Balnave’s best vineyards and matured in top-notch new French oak – a classic example of ‘letting the wine eat the oak, not letting the oak eat the wine’. In a scaled down version, Balnaves Cabernet Sauvignon 2007 ($35) and Cabernet Merlot 2007 ($24) also deliver Coonawarra flavour, elegance and drinkability. This is a great estate.

Stags’ Leap Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon 2005 $60
Farmer Bros imported this into Canberra in the late seventies and early eighties when good Australian cabernets were scarce. The competition’s fiercer now (cabernet’s second only to shiraz in volume), so at $60 it’s a bold move by Foster’s. It’s big, ripe style of cabernet, with juicy, blackcurrant-like flavours offset by firm, ripe tannins. It looks young and fresh at four years’ age and probably will drink well for a decade or two. A superb wine.

Barwang Hilltops Cabernet Sauvignon 2007 $20
This is a solid cabernet, made by McWilliams from their Barwang Vineyard located at nearby Young (the Hilltops region). The underlying ripe, varietal flavours manage to push up through assertive, firm, drying tannins. Needs a good chunk of protein (rare steak would be good) to cut through that firm structure. Very good value and sometimes discounted well below the $20 recommended price.

Penny’s Hill McLaren Vale Cabernet 2007 $24
This is a big, ripe red from the warm McLaren Vale region. The firm tannins suggest cabernet, but in the aroma and flavour the varietal character becomes a little blurred. It’s a nice, chunky red offering fair value.

Howard Park Scotsdale Great Southern Cabernet Sauvignon 2007 $40
We return to sharp varietal definition in two contrasting Howard Park wines from individual vineyards in Western Australia’s Great Southern and Margaret River regions. The Great Southern wine presents ripe-berry flavours – in a lovely interplay with classy oak – without the leafy notes (usually indicative of a cool season) seen in the Margaret River wine. Scotsdale features very intense, very young flavours and taut, elegant structure.

Howard Park Leston Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon 2007 $40
Just as in the Scotsdale vineyard wine, high-quality oak plays a dominant flavour role in Leston. It’s symbiotic relationship between oak and fruit that lifts the wine to a more complex, enjoyable level. There’s crystal-clear varietal definition, too, with that ‘leafy’ edge adding more complexity, as it doesn’t descend into green, unripe characters. In this wine it’s part of a harmonious, high-toned, elegant cabernet of considerable strength. These Howard Park cabernets are strong, characterful wines needing a few more years’ bottle age to reveal their best.

Moss Wood Margaret River Moss Wood Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon 2006 $100
The law of diminishing returns applies as much to the wine world as any other. So, no, Moss Wood isn’t two and a half times better than the $40 Howard Park wines.  But there’s discernibly more body, extra flavour concentration and a lovely slick, silky depth – in the taut, elegant regional mould. The lofty price reflects scarcity and a hard-won reputation earned over many decades by one of Margaret River’s oldest vineyards (founded 1969). Pure class.

Cape Mentelle Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon 2005 $84
This is another of the time-proven Margaret River cabernets, founded by David Hohnen in 1970 and now owned by Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton. It’s a firmer, more tannic wine than the Moss Wood with quite strong ‘tomato leaf’ character seasoning the riper, underlying cabernet berry flavours. While the austerity of the tannins seems in keeping with a cabernet of this fruit intensity, I suspect it’s not one of the Cape Mentelle greats and I have a caveat on the persistent ‘leafy’ character in this wine. At this price caveats are significant.

Juniper Estate Margaret River Cabernet Sauvignon 2005 $40
Juniper, too, comes from old (36 years) Margaret River vines, and, like Cape Mentelle, shows some austere tannins. But there’s a good depth of varietal fruit to match – adding up to good value in this distinguished company.

Helm Premium Cabernet Sauvignon 2006 $52
For the second year in a row Ken Helm (hand-in-hand with grape grower Al Lustenberger) has banished the green notes that blighted too many Canberra cabernets in the past. The 2006 is opulent by comparison with those earlier wines. Indeed, there’s a plush depth to the fruit, good varietal definition and ripe, firm tannins to hold it all together. But there’s one last frontier for Ken to conquer – oak – if he’s to justify the $52 price tag and bear comparison with the greats. The Howard Park, Moss Wood, and Balnaves wines in particular demonstrate how the right oak lifts high-calibre wine to another flavour and structural dimension.

Chateau Peyrabon Haut-Medoc 2005 $29.40
As a retailer I made several trips to Bordeaux seeking mid-priced cabernets for the Australian market – but gave up. The quality was there in abundance at higher prices. But occasionally, it seems, $30 wines, like this Woolworths’ import for its Dan Murphy chain, just trip over the ‘value’ line. It’s not comparable in style, say, to Balnaves cabernet at $24. But it’s a decent, solid wine from a strong vintage, featuring ripe fruit and the classic, austere ‘claret’ tannin structure. It’s fully priced at $29.40, so watch for the specials!

Montes Apalta Vineyard Colchagua Valley Chile Cabernet Sauvignon Carmenere 2007 $14.60
Note to Woolies’ wine buyers: have you actually tasted this?

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2009

Taking our wine names to the world

For all the international success of Australian wine (we exported $2.46 billion worth in the year to January 2009, 17% less than in the year to January 2008), our export markets know little of the diverse regional wine styles flowing from our 112 official ‘geographic indications’ (GIs).

Our export success to date rests primarily on ‘brand Australia’ –  based on fruity, fresh, reliable varietals, more often than not sourced from multiple regions and bearing the generic origin ‘South Eastern Australia’.

It has been a remarkable achievement requiring a massive investment in vineyards, wineries, inventory, marketing and distribution. And while it provides a solid base for expansion, the fairly narrow focus to date tends to typecast Australia as one big, hot country producing predictably fruity, alcoholic wines.

About  twenty years after Penfolds Grange won its international reputation as ‘the one true first growth of the southern hemisphere’, accolades for our upmarket wines tend to be more for our big, juicy, warm-climate reds, notably shiraz, then for any other of our specialties.

We shouldn’t lament that success. But we do need to tell the rest of the story – perhaps starting with the world’s opinion makers and chipping away year after year. We certainly have the wines to build an expanded image of Australia.

Just how entrenched the image is came through at a large-scale pinot noir tasting on the Mornington Peninsula in February. The UK’s Jancis Robinson, no stranger to Australian wine (she recognised the unique glory of Hunter semillon quarter of a century ago), said the Australian pinots would turn heads in London. They were more refined and delicate than she’d anticipated.

At the same event, on his first visit to Australia, respected Burgundian vigneron, Frederic Mugnier, said, “Australian pinot is not at all what I thought it would be. They are much better. The stereotype I had in mind was of dark, thick and jammy wines. They are the reverse – delicate, fluid, juicy and delicious – bravo”.

That was the wine talking of course – carefully selected examples of the best from Tasmania, Yarra Valley, Mornington and Macedon. One sip beats a thousand press releases.

Good wine always talks. At a Sydney dinner we wowed Dino and Stefano Illuminati, vignerons from Abruzzi, Italy, with 1998 vintage Peter Lehmann Barossa Valley Stonewell Shiraz – a big, warm, sublime, and stereotypical, Australian shiraz.

It was the sort of wine they’d become used to in their visits to Australia since the early nineties. They loved the style, partly because it related it to their own robust, earthy reds made from the montepulciano grape.

But they were not prepared for their next Australian shiraz, served blind at Sydney’s Level Forty-One Restaurant. The harbour lights sparkled far below. The waiter splashed the limpid, shimmering, crimson-rimmed mystery red from the crystal decanter into our Riedel glasses.

Dino’s expressive face lit up as he swirled the glass and sniffed. ‘Fantastico’, he said. Stefano agreed. They loved its beautiful fragrance and graceful, supple, plush palate. Quickly they agreed that it was French – and magnificent.
“Yes”, we Aussies agreed, “it’s a beautiful wine. But it’s Australian”. “No”, the Illuminatis gasped together. “This can’t be Australian”. Even more shocking was the revelation that it came from Canberra – Clonakilla Shiraz Viognier 2006. Once again, the wine had spoken. For the Illuminatis the stereotype was smashed – in the most delightful way imaginable.

They wanted to know about Canberra and how it was different from the Barossa and did Australia really make more than one style of shiraz. They’re keen to learn more on future visits.

Bit by bit, over time, our industry has to paint this picture to drinkers and opinion makers around the world.

And just as our industry brought leading writers to Australia twenty years ago, at the dawn of our big export push, it’s commencing a new pitch to the international opinion makers through the first ‘Landmark Australia Tutorial’.

The series of tutorials, held in the Barossa between the first and fifth of June, presented 248 top-notch Australian wines to a dozen carefully selected international communicators. The wines covered more than half a century of vintages, including Seppelt Great Western Hermitage K72 Shiraz, Wynns Coonawarra Michael Hermitage 1995 and Penfolds Grange 1955 and a diverse range of modern wines.

You can read more about the event at www.landmark-wineaustralia.com

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2009

Albarino mix-up spreads to Spain

Until recently Australia’s vignerons had – or thought they had – about 150 hectares of albarino in the ground. But DNA testing initiated by the CSIRO in January found that our albarino was, in fact, savagnin blanc (not related to the popular variety sauvignon blanc, and also known as traminer).

The discovery opens a can of worms for every one in the supply chain from vine nurseries, to growers, makers, distributors, retailers and scientific and regulatory bodies around the world.

In Australia, the first and most immediately affected are successful albarino makers with stock labelled and ready for market or under production from the 2009 vintage. These include the Barossa’s Damien Tscharke (our largest producer, with 4,000 cases of the 2009 vintage in the making), Brown Brothers, Crittenden Wines and Bermagui’s tiny Rusty Fig vineyard, owned by Garry Potts and Frances Perkins.

Following the CSIRO discovery, the Australian Wine and Brand Corporation – the federal body responsible for administering wine law – issued a blunt press release. It told winemakers that it was an offence to sell wine with a false description and that “if you have ‘albarino’ vines that were sourced from the CSIRO collection, then the wine produced from those vines cannot be described using that name”. It also urged growers with vines from other sources to have their material DNA tested.

On the surface that sound fair enough. Indeed, all of the albarino makers I’ve spoken to are preparing for the change. But the black letter of the law doesn’t take into account the peculiar circumstances of this error. It appears to have originated in Spain, affects many wine producing countries (including Spain, Portugal and Australia) and its origins may go as far back as 1100AD.

In a paper to be published in the May edition of Grape Grower & Winemaker, Chris Bourke (owner of Sons & Brother vineyard, Orange) traces the history of savagnin and discusses its confusion with albarino. He told me that savagnin probably found its way from France’s Jura region to Galicia, northwestern Spain, around 1100AD.

There it would have grown side-by-side with albarino, the region’s current signature variety, ever since. He says there is good evidence that modern Spanish and Portuguese ‘albarino’ vineyards contain a mix of three varieties – albarino, savagnin and caino blanco – and, therefore, that much of what Spain sells as ‘albarino’ is probably a blend of the three varieties.

This may explain why experts see so much similarity between Australian ‘albarino’, made from savagnin, and Spanish albarino

Just as a visiting French vine expert precipitated Australia’s recent ‘albarino’ testing, another Frenchman, Paul Truel, questioned the identity of Spain’s albarino as far back as 1983, Chris Bourke claims.

Ultimately the Spanish established that ‘true’ albarino had a distinctive DNA, identified savagnin as a ‘false’ albarino and removed it from the national collection – but not before the damage was done.

The Spanish, says Bourke, claim that a single mis-identified vine is responsible for the false albarino that spread around the world.

For Australia, the problem began unknowingly when the CSIRO sourced ‘albarino’ from Galicia, Spain, in 1989. This is thought to be the ultimate source of all the ‘albarino’ now planted here. In a letter to his albarino customers last week, Mornington Peninsula vigneron Garry Crittenden wrote, “The problem seems to be generic in that the only known source of planting material in the whole of Australia is CSIRO so every producer, Australia wide, is caught up in the issue. Somehow there has been a stuff up along the line”. Indeed.

Garry said that he sources albarino from two blocks on the Mornington Peninsula and Sam Miranda’s vineyard in the King Valley and that he’s tracked all three back to the CSIRO.

So if what we’ve been drinking as albarino is actually savagnin (an unfamiliar variety to most of us) and savagnin is just another name for traminer (a familiar old friend to Australians), why doesn’t it taste musky and grapey like the traminer we’re used to?

This is probably where the whole world is confused – and why experts like the Barossa’s Damien Tscharke and Mornington’s Garry Crittenden find it impossible to distinguish between savagnin and albarino vines or the wines made from them. The same might be said for all those Portuguese and Spanish growers, too.

It highlights the subtleties of the vine, the limitations of DNA testing and also the persistence of muscat, perhaps the oldest of our cultivated varieties. Muscat influences many varieties and accounts for the aroma and flavour difference between savagnin (traminer) and gewürztraminer.

Now, Australians and Germans use traminer, incorrectly, as a synonym for gewürztraminer. The difference between the two is easily discernible in the colour of the berries and the aroma and flavour of wine made from them. But, says Chris Bourke, the two have identical DNA.

He says the difference is probably made by a single enzyme that boosts production in the berries of monoterpenes – the compounds that give gewürztraminer its powerful, distinctive musky aroma, flavour and viscosity – traits absent in mere traminer (savagnin).

While the existence of the two strains (sometime called musque clones and non-musque clones) has long been known, Bourke believes that this is the first appearance in Australia of the non-musque strain since James Busby’s importation of it in 1832. But Bourke sees its presence as a positive.

However, Australian albarino makers now face a challenge in re-branding their product and selling the message to drinkers. But they have much on their side, including knowledgeable drinkers, strong trade support, especially among sommeliers, and a tasty product with a real flavour difference.

Garry Crittenden is hopeful that a coming stakeholder meeting with the AWBC can produce a practical result – perhaps giving producers a phasing-in period to sell existing stock in the domestic market as ‘albarino’.

However, other options could be available. Those with proprietary names, such as Tscharke ‘Girl Talk’ and Crittenden ‘Los Hermanos’ might remove the varietal tag from the front label altogether – and perhaps tell the savagnin story on the back label.

Tscharke, Crittenden, Brown and Potts all say that regardless of the outcome they intend to continue with the variety whatever it’s called. It’ll still taste the same.

With Australian winemakers preparing to rename their albarinos, what should we expect of Spanish producers? If, as seems likely, much of their albarino production is a blend of albarino, savagnin and caino blanco, shouldn’t it, too, be renamed to reflect the reality?

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2009

Gago keeps the Penfolds flame burning

Peter Gago presented the soon-to-be-released Grange 2004 and other top-end Penfolds wines in Canberra recently. What a contrast I noted between these confident, beautiful, unique, world-class wines and the dour attitude of Foster’s (Penfolds’ parent company) towards its suffering wine division.

The survival of the Penfolds culture across decades of rationalisation, culminating in Foster’s disastrous acquisition of Southcorp (previous owner of Penfolds), seems to be a result largely of the tenacity of winemakers and grape growers behind the wines.

What Gago and his team have achieved is remarkable. It’s hard to over estimate just how profoundly good these top end wines are and how important they are to Australia’s export push into the future.

The ‘halo’ effect created by Penfolds wines now extends well beyond Grange as critics and some consumers in our major export markets realise the depth of what Max Schubert created and his successors, Don Ditter, John Duval and Peter Gago, extended. Much of the mystique rests on the outstanding cellaring capacity of the wines, with vintages back to the fifties and sixties periodically bowling the critics over.

The historic cellar at Magill, in urban Adelaide, is now a hub of innovation – where Gago and the team continue to fine-tune the traditional styles and develop new ones. They make many of the top wines, including Grange, in the same old open concrete fermenters that Max used back in the early fifties.

The traditional wines evolved over the last decade or so, maintaining their robust structure, but becoming perhaps a little brighter and purer in fruit expression with finer tannin structure. The new 2004 Grange is an extraordinary example of this subtle shift. It’s a powerful expression of warm-climate shiraz, still vibrant and crimson coloured at five years, with deep layers of fruit and tannin. Gago sees it as the ‘best in the last 25 years’, comparing it stylistically to the 1990 and 1996. But in true Grange fashion, it won’t begin to reveal its best for another decade.

Some of the zealots now spruiking our elegant cool-climates shiraz and pooh-poohing traditional styles might have a rethink when they taste 2004 Grange – or its robust but graceful and elegant cellar mate RWT Barossa Valley Shiraz 2006. This is as good as Barossa shiraz gets.

The third shiraz among the new releases, St Henri 2005, sits apart stylistically from Grange. It’s a taut, elegant style aged in very old, large oak casks. These provide maturation but not oak flavour – an inherent component, in different ways, of both Grange (100% new American oak) and RWT (French oak barrels, 70% new).

From experience, St Henri, despite its lighter body, needs time to reveal its best – perhaps from about ten years’ age, although good vintages like the 1983 and 1971 still drink beautifully.

The only single-vineyard red among the upcoming releases is the Magill Estate Shiraz 2006, matured, for the first time since 1998 in all new oak – 71% French, 29% American. It’s a fuller style than St Henri, but still fine boned and needing another four or of five years to reveal its best.

Bin 707 2006, the cabernet equivalent of Grange, is a multi-region blend matured in all new American oak. Current orthodoxy says that cabernet should be in French oak. But American oak works for modern Bin 707, principally because it’s such fine oak, but also because the fruit has the power to support it. Gago accurately describes 707 and Grange as being like wound-up springs, needing time to uncoil. This gels with my own experience as we are currently drinking the 1986 vintage at Chateau Shanahan and see no need to rush the last few precious bottles.

Gago says that from the 2008 vintage there’ll be an upmarket cabernet to accompany Bin 707. He believes that just as the fragrant, French-oak-matured RWT Barossa Shiraz protects the powerful American-oak-matured Grange style from change, the new French-oak-matured Coonawarra Cabernet (yet to be named) ought to protect the Bin 707 style.

And for visitors to the cellar door and restaurant at Magill, Gago offers several ‘Cellar Reserve’ wines made and matured on the estate.

The opulent, ripe, French-oak-matured, Cellar Reserve Barossa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon 2006 comes from very old vineyards, including Penfolds Kalimna vineyard in the northern Barossa. This one could be cellared, but it’s succulent and lovely to enjoy now, too.

Cellar Reserve Adelaide Hills Pinot Noir has been on the menu for many years, but the 2007, to me is outstanding. It’s in the deeply layered Penfolds style, with silky, deep tannins and a spectrum of very complex varietal flavours. This should evolve well for a decade or more.

The first release of a Cellar Reserve McLaren Vale Tempranillo (2007 vintage) follows several earlier trials with the variety. It’s from the Oliver vineyard, McLaren Vale, and goes straight to the top of the class for this variety in Australia.

Even more accomplished is the Cellar Reserve Barossa Valley Sangiovese 2007, sourced from vines planted on the Kalimna Vineyard in the early eighties and the ten-year-old Georgiadis Vineyard at nearby Marananga.

I’ve not tasted another Australian sangiovese that comes near this for quality. It has richness, purity of varietal flavour, complexity and the loveliest ripe-tannin structure imaginable. This is a masterpiece.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2009

Amazing brew marks Chuck Hahn’s double anniversary

Chuck Hahn should take a bow for his brewing masterpiece – Ten20 Commemorative Ale – an almost impossibly luxurious, harmonious, and complex beer. Other brewers are going to look at this in awe.

Chuck brewed it to celebrate the twentieth anniversary of Hahn Premium and the tenth of James Squire. And in a salute to his brewing alma maters, he used hops from the USA, New Zealand and Australia.

Chuck says that dry hopping with Pacific Hallertau from New Zealand gives the beer its distinctive, herbal/citrus aroma. But that’s just the entrée to a remarkably powerful but harmonious brew.

It’s a deep copper colour, tinged with mahogany: and behind the tangy hops aroma lies a huge depth of malt. It’s there in the aroma, but in the mouth it’s opulent, bordering on viscous – with a silky, smooth texture that could be too much if it weren’t for the heady alcohol (7.9 per cent) and countervailing hops bitterness.

It’s risky brewing beers of this dimension as one or another flavour easily dominates (many undrinkable curiosities in the market testify to this). Chuck’s mastery is in creating such a bold, malty, hoppy, alcoholic beer that’s such a pleasure to drink. It’s one to sip, like wine.

Alas, he’s brewed but 1,900 cases. It’s just come into the market and available in selected retail outlets.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2009