Category Archives: Wine

Farewell Jim Murphy — Canberra’s tenacious retailer

How did Jim Murphy thrive in Canberra’s competitive liquor retail environment over all those decades? He set up shop in the late seventies, just as the Trade Practices Act (aided in Canberra by liberalised licensing laws) precipitated a complete restructuring of wine production, distribution and retailing Australia wide.

Yet Jim successfully stepped from the genteel world of wine selling at the Australian National University into the then brutal world of Canberra liquor retailing. Retail competitors at the time gave him little hope of survival.

I met Jim just before the transition. I was already a retail competitor and remained one for the next 28 years. Today’s article therefore presents the subjective view of a former commercial adversary.

Towards the end of 1976 Jim agreed to cater for my wedding at the ANU staff centre early the next year. A poor student, taking a vacation job at Farmer Bros Wine and Spirit Merchants, I suggested bringing my own wine. The brothers were cheaper than him, I explained.

After that diplomatic start, we haggled, and Jim agreed (very generously, in retrospect) on BYO bubbly, provided the staff centre supplied the rest. The wedding proceeded smoothly, the vacation job became a career and our paths crossed every now and then until Jim’s death on 26 May.

Richard and David Farmer had opened Farmer Bros at Manuka in June 1975. The store became a sensation, offering discounted wine of all types, from casks to Grange.

David Farmer recalls how the new store attracted Jim’s clients from the university, eventually prompting Jim to check out the usurper. Farmer recalls, “Jim was Canberra’s wine authority then and I don’t think Manuka went down too well”.

In the ensuing years Canberra drinkers raked in the wine bargains as the competition heated up. Farmer Bros led the charge, quickly developing a national following through a press-ad-driven mail order business. Liquor licences spread into grocery stores, putting wine in every suburban shopping centre. And two vigorous independents – Peter and Mary Tyson’s The Grog Shop and John and Roby Brown’s Candamber – took on Farmer Bros in the discount wine stakes.

But Jim Murphy avoided the discount scrum, quietly opening at what we competitors regarded as a second-tier, weekend-only site opposite, Fyshwick fruit and vegetable markets. How wrong we were.

Throughout the eighties and until 1994 Farmer Bros retained its dominance in the Canberra wine market – and became a major force nationally, with an Australia-wide mail order business and stores in Sydney and Melbourne. The Grog Shop survived only a few years but Candamber and Jim Murphy prospered.

Like Farmer Bros, Candamber relied heavily on a mailing list to drive traffic to its stores. But Jim Murphy stuck to one outlet at this time, steadily building a personal following – never letting competitors set his agenda.

Long-time customer Jac Cousin runs off a list of attributes behind Murphy’s success and customer loyalty: being at the shop front to meet and greet, his knowledge, carrying a good selection, having stuff (especially old wines) others didn’t have, giving reasonable advice on buying for particular situations, making sure things ran as he wanted and “being a great bloke to deal with”.

Cousin particularly liked Jim’s lunches where “people could relax and get in a mood to buy more than they should” – and learn about wine from guest winemakers.

By the late eighties the independent trade controlled the bottled wine market across Australia. The major retail chains had moved into liquor, but their move into fine was half a decade off.

During this time Canberra experienced a particularly sharp burst of competition after the brothers Farmer split up. After a short, sharp bidding war, David and Josephine Farmer – with the support of partners including Shane and Nada Sinclair, myself, Jill Shanahan and David Harding – took complete control of Farmer Bros. Richard Farmer promptly set up his own liquor retailing business in competition and all hell broke loose – to the great joy (and confusion) of Canberra wine drinkers.

I was there in the thick of it, watching Farmer Bros sales grow, even as Richard Farmer’s sales took off. This had to be at the expense of competitors, including Murphy. But Murphy quietly sidestepped hostilities and ultimately outlasted both brothers.

Farmer Bros survived Richard Farmer by several years. But the collapse of Farmer Bros, towards the end of 1994, probably benefited Murphy and Canberra’s other independent retailers. The collapse also coincided with a decision by Coles’ liquor head office in Sydney to move into the fine wine market.

Canberra and Murphy didn’t feel any impact at first. But the scene was now set for a massive liquor market grab by Coles and, later, Woolworths. The competition Murphy faced between the late seventies and mid nineties would turn out to be nothing compared to what followed.

It started slowly, then built. As independents filled the gap left by Farmer Bros’ demise, Liquorland Australia Pty Ltd (the liquor arm of Coles) acquired Farmer Bros’ stores – only to find that only one of the five in Canberra, Manuka, worked without the mailing list and wine club newsletters. Cellarmaster Wines, one of the world’s great direct marketers, had already acquired these.

The Liquorland acquisition of Farmer Bros, then, didn’t initially put any pressure on Canberra’s independents. But in October 1994 Liquorland opened its first Vintage Cellars outlet at Mosman Junction, Sydney. “That’s when we got serious about wine”, recalls former Managing Director, Craig Watkins.

A national rollout of the Vintage Cellars brand proceeded rapidly, and included re-badging the original Farmer Bros store at Manuka and opening a second outlet at Woden Plaza. Shane Sinclair and I had joined Coles liquor following the demise of Farmer Bros and played key roles in the Vintage Cellars roll out. By the end of the nineties, Coles, through these outlets, had taken a significant slice of the Canberra fine wine market – giving Jim Murphy and other retailers a dose of competition – and glimpse of where the supermarkets were headed.

By the turn of the century Coles dominated the liquor and fine wine market in Australia. But in the opening years of the new century Coles liquor lost the plot, allowing Woolworths to gain the upper hand. A liquor juggernaut called Dan Murphy was about to sweep the country, Canberra included.

Belatedly, Coles launched its own “big box” brand, First Choice, to counter Dan Murphy’s growing might. Today, tiny Canberra has three Dan Murphy and three First Choice outlets – a massive presence for such a small population. Yet Jim Murphy not only survived their rollout, but opened a second store, at the airport, run by his son Adrien (AJ).

Tony Leon, former partner of the late Dan Murphy, managed the brand’s Australia wide rollout for Woolworths. He later left Woolworths and now drives the expansion of Coles-owned First Choice.

Leon says, “I’ve always believed a successful independent can survive against the likes of First Choice and Dan Murphy”. He says he never met Jim Murphy, but knew his business and regarded him as very good retailer.

Leon adds, “I’ve tried to buy him from both sides – but he said no. He must’ve been confident about his business to do that”.

Former Coles Liquor boss, Craig Watkins, knew Jim and often visited Market Cellars, impressed by Murphy’s success at an out of the way site. “He was always successful – a fantastic negotiator, a great relationship builder, respected by suppliers and a street fighter. He was always going to succeed, even when Dan Murphy and First Choice came to town. He saw very early not to put too much emphasis on beer and spirits and that wine is sexy. The politically powerful and big business were Jim’s customers”.

Long-term friend, winemaker and supplier, David O’Leary, says, “Jim knew a hell of a lot about the consumer and what the consumer wanted”. He recalls weekend visits to Market Cellars every year since the mid eighties, working the floor, talking to tasters, talking at the Sunday lunch – “and going home Monday totally shagged”.

O’Leary’s friendship with Murphy began around 1985 or 1986. As a 25 year old O’Leary been sent to Hardy’s Tintara Winery, to sort out the red wines – bringing fruit and body back to wines that’d gone off track in recent years.

He says, “Jim was a great friend of the Hardy family, especially Bill and Tom and often came across to Hardys”. O’Leary promoted Hardy’s wines during his first trips to Market Cellars. But when O’Leary moved to Annie’s Lane and later set up O’Leary Walker with Nick Walker, Jim offered support. “Jim became a terrific sling shot for us”, says O’Leary.

Former competitor David Farmer believes Jim Murphy was probably one of the last of the old-time wine merchants, in the traditional English sense – the sort that “you need one in your life to guide and teach, and it has to be about good times and friends”, says Farmer.

With Coles and Woolworths now holding around 79 per cent of the bottled wine market, winemakers and consumers alike need strong independents like Jim Murphy. Fortunately for Canberra, the Murphy family remains committed to the business. Family spokesman, Michael says Jim’s younger son, AJ, will oversee both stores. “He’s a chip off the old block”, says Phelps.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2011

Show judges too cool-climate orientated says Grant Burge

Visiting Canberra two weeks back, Barossa vigneron Grant Burge rated 2010 his “best white vintage in 10 years”.  Then came the highs and lows of a wet 2011 season, “throwing up all the diseases in one year”, devastating crops in many vineyards, and driving up spraying and vineyard costs across the board.

In his own vineyards – about 400 hectares, mainly in the southern Barossa – Burge sprayed against disease 12 to 16 times, instead of the usual four. And when late-season rain spurred outbreaks of botrytis cinerea, vineyard workers cut out infected berries by hand.

Faced by unrelenting disease pressures, says Burge, “some growers stopped spraying, because they felt uncertain about the final result”. Better to cut their losses early, they reasoned, than to spend more on spraying when there might be no grapes to sell in any event. Some lost their entire crops.

As a winemaker needing every berry, Burge persisted and in the end reaped a good harvest from his own vineyards. In the final ripening period, he says, mild to cool weather settled on the Barossa, bringing healthy fruit to flavour ripeness at unusually low sugar levels. Reds at Burge’s elevated Corryton Park Vineyard, for example, came in at around 12.5 to 13.4 Baume (a measure of sugar), instead of the usual 14 plus.

The low temperatures at ripening produced intense flavours and high natural acidity in the whites, says Burge, and now believes they’ll be even better than the 2010s.

He rates Barossa Valley ahead of the adjoining, cooler Eden Valley in 2011, particularly for cabernet sauvignon. Burge’s Corryton Park vineyard – normally much cooler than the Barossa floor, and more akin to Coonawarra – usually produces his best cabernet.

But in 2011, says Burge, “cabernet sauvignon off the valley floor is the best in 25 years. If fact, I’ve never seen the quality before. I’ve never seen the purple colour on the floor, like at Corryton, but it’s black-purple”.

Overall, says Burge, 2011 wines seem generally leaner, very pure in their fruit expression, less alcoholic and needing time to mature – comments closely paralleling the Canberra 2011 experience.

Burge visited Canberra to promote his flagship Barossa shiraz, Meshach ($155), released, like Grange, at five years. But Burge operates on a large scale for a private Australian producer – and the styles he makes extend far beyond the more expensive reds behind his reputation.

Burge’s 400-plus hectares of vines supply only 60 per cent of company needs. The other 40 per cent comes from about 20 long-term growers, says Burge.

He now makes more white wine than red, largely through the success of his $30-a-bottle sparkling wines, sourced from the cool Adelaide Hills (immediately to the south of Eden Valley on the Mount Lofty Ranges).

But Burge’s most intense passion clearly lies in his beloved Barossa reds.  On this trip he’s showing us Meshach 2006 (straight shiraz, mainly from the Filsell vineyard) and Holy Trinity 2008 ($36), a blend of grenache, shiraz and mourvedre.

They’re beautiful examples of their styles – Meshach made since 1988 and Holy Trinity from 1995. While we might call them “traditional” robust, warm-climate styles, they’re both thoroughly modern wines, expressing regional fruit flavours first and foremost, and benefiting from careful fine-tuning over the years.

While the market still loves them, Burge laments a shift away from the style in wine shows. He says the judges are now “all cool-climate orientated. I went to a few shows last year with Craig [winemaker Craig Stansborough] and warm climate wines like McLaren Vale and Barossa couldn’t get a look in. Anything showing American oak got kicked out. But some of the cool shirazes were tried were just green. I understand they need to show a lead for the industry, but they shouldn’t get too far from the public. The judges now have a narrow focus”.

He sees it as a worrying trend that wine judges today tend to award a narrower range of styles now than an older generation did in the past.

Burge offers interesting insights into international markets, too. He exports to 32 countries, sees opportunities for strong brands despite our dollar’s strength. Describing China as “the wild, wild east”, he’s built export volumes of high quality wine there through “individuals all over the place” and expects ultimately to have a central distributor.

He’s neve done much in the United States but plans to attack the market in the near future and sees huge potential there for good wine. Research, however, revealed a widespread perception in America that Australia doesn’t make good quality wine – a stereotype, he believes, created by the success of cheap, fruity wines like Yellowtail.

He’ll therefore emphasise Barossa Valley, not Australia, as Grant Burge wines roll out across America.

Oh, and the wines? See Grant Burge Meshach 2006 and Thorn Vineyard Eden Valley Riesling 2010  in today’s reviews and Holy Trinity 2008 next week.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2011

Majella of Coonawarra — from sheep farming to winemaking

At Chateau Shanahan we’ve experienced cellaring joy and disappointments over the years. But consistent pleasure in older bottles of Majella Coonawarra cabernet sauvignon and The Malleea cabernet shiraz, reminded us of this marvellous winery’s interesting transition from farming to grape growing to winemaking.

When brothers Brian and Anthony Lynn made the first Majella wine in 1991, they’d been growing grapes in Coonawarra for twenty-three years. They’d lived all their lives in the area. They’d grown fat lambs and wool long before vines took root on the family farm in 1968. Yet their first step into winemaking was, perhaps, even more tentative than their first step into grape growing had been two decades earlier.

Then, at least, there was a pre-arranged buyer for the grapes. Eric Brand, a good mate of George Lynn (Brian’s and Anthony’s late father), encouraged the planting of six acres of shiraz and agreed to buy the grapes to help satisfy a winemaking contract with Hardys.

The first Majella wine, a 1991 Coonawarra Shiraz, however, had no guaranteed buyers. If you’d asked Brian or Anthony where the business was headed when the wine was released in 1993, they’d not have foreseen Majella’s complete transition from contract grape grower to leading wine estate in just ten years.

People ask, were we visionary?” says Brian ‘Prof’ Lynn. “And I say, not really”. But Majella’s huge success wasn’t just blind luck either. It’s a success that grew from strong, deep roots in the Coonawarra landscape and community, fertilised by experience, skill, imagination, good management and – during it’s first decade of winemaking at least – by impeccable timing.

The release of Majella’s 1991 shiraz in 1993 came at the beginning of the unprecedented global red-wine boom. The wine was, and still is, a brilliant drop, beautifully packaged (designed by Barbara Harkness) and realistically priced.

I recall my first taste of it on a wine-buying trip to Coonawarra with David Farmer in September, 1993. At a little cook-your-own steakhouse, Nibs – owned at the time by Bill Brand and ‘Prof’ Lynn – the new Majella label caught our eye amongst all the familiar names on display. Who the hell was this we wondered? Nice label.

Nice wine, too – a classy drop, packed with Coonawarra’s unique ripe-berry flavour. Whether it was our huge grins or the label that prompted Patricia Lynn (Prof’s and Anthony’s mum) to approach us, I’ll never know, because we never met again. She died a few years after our visit.

But this former mayor of Penola (the little town at Coonawarra’s southern tip) turned on the warmth and charm for her Canberra visitors with tales of wartime Canberra. “I was the minutes secretary to the Minister’s secretary’, she told us of her job with the Minister for Supply. She knew ‘Chif’ and Nugget Coombs and that “after the bombing of Leeds, that Lithgow was the only remaining .303 manufacturing plant in the allied group”.

And she told us of Majella. In the post war years she met and married George Lynn, moved to the Coonawarra area where they produced wool on a property just to the south of Penola. One night Patricia told George she wanted to name the property ‘Majellan’ – after St Gerard Majellan, the catholic patron saint of mothers. She’d lost her first child and wanted another.

George’s response was pragmatic. ‘Majellan’ was too long to stamp on a wool bale. End of conversation – although a memorable night in other ways, recalled Patricia. Next morning, George offered a solution. Drop the “n”. And so Majella was born as a wool farm. In 1960 it became a fat lamb farm, too, when George bought his uncle Frank’s block in the heart of Coonawarra. In 1968 Majella became a vineyard. And in 1991, a wine name.

The Lynn family’s move into grape growing, recalls Prof, followed a high school geography project on Coonawarra viticulture. With luminaries such as Bill and Jock Redman, Eric Brand and Phil Laffer advising him, the young Prof’s interest shifted from the theoretical to the practical.

With advice and encouragement from Eric Brand of Laira vineyards, Prof and his dad planted six acres of shiraz in 1968. The propagated the vines from cuttings taken, on Bill Redman’s advice, from Arthur Hoffman’s ‘North Block’ (now Redmans). Prof remembers Bill Redman saying, “I’ll take you to Hoffman’s, because they’re the best shiraz in Coonawarra”.

Similarly, when the Lynns decided to add cabernet sauvignon to the mix old Jock Redman of Wynns advised them to take cuttings from vines he’d marked with white paint. These, he said, produced the best wine.

With a steady contract to supply grapes to Eric Brand, the Lynns were happy with those early grape-growing years. But in 1974 George became ill. By the time he died in 1976, the Brand contract had ended and nobody wanted Coonawarra shiraz – only cabernet, which made up only one third of the Majella plantings.

If we didn’t have wool, we would’ve gone broke”, says Prof. Business improved in the early eighties when Majella began selling grapes to Wynns – an arrangement that lasted until vintage 2001. And it was grapes that saved the Lynns in the wool crash of the late eighties and early nineties. “We would’ve gone broke without grapes, then”, laughs Prof.

So, by the time Majella made its first wine in 1991, it had served a long, tough apprenticeship learning how to grow high-quality wine grapes good enough to sell even in tough times.

Mature red vines on a good Coonawarra plot, and the ability to produce top grapes, says Prof, is the family’s biggest asset – entrusted, in the early days, to his old mates, the Brands and their talented winemaker, Bruce Gregory.

Then in 1999 Gregory joined the Lynn family full time at Majella’s new winery, next to the cellar door, opened in 1996.

Following its complete transition to winemaking a decade ago, Majella cemented its reputation as one of the region’s great winemakers. The wines all bear the regional style stamp.

Not surprisingly cabernet sauvignon ($33), Coonawarra’s great specialty, now sparks more interest than the shiraz ($30) that blazed the way for the label from the 1991 vintage. And the $75 long-lived flagship, The Malleea, a cabernet shiraz blend, hits profound heights. The same blend, in the $18 The Musician label , provides drink-now pleasure without diminishing the Coonawarra signature.

As the world’s wealthiest people pay ever greater prices for Bordeaux’s cabernet-based reds, we can get on quietly drinking estate-made Majella, and other Coonawarra and Margaret River reds, of comparable quality, at a fraction of the price.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2011

Tasting John’s Blend 1990 to 2006

In 1967 Wolf Blass winemaker, John Glaetzer, received a load of “beautiful, concentrated” cabernet sauvignon from Bill Potts’ vineyard, Langhorne Creek. Glaetzer turned those grapes into the first Wolf Blass Grey Label Cabernet Sauvignon.

Seven years later, inspired by those beautiful grapes, Glaetzer (still working for Blass) made John’s Blend No. 1 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon, using fruit from Bill Potts’ vineyard.

Glaetzer’s small-production wine developed a loyal following, its reputation spread mainly by word-of-mouth. And in Canberra, the word spread mainly through wine merchant Jim Murphy, a long-term supporter of Wolf Blass and John Glaetzer.

A couple of weeks back, a disparate group of 11 Canberra followers – led by Charlotte Galloway, an ANU lecturer in Art History and Curatorship – raided their cellars to hold a John’s Blend vertical tasting: all the vintages, bar 1992, from 1990 to 2006.

No, not a sniff and spit tasting, but a leisurely stroll through the sequence over lunch on a crisp, sunny autumn day – hosted by Warwick McKibbin and fiancée, Renee Fry, and attended by Galloway, Jac and Kathy Cousin, Jenny and Peter Gibson, James Horne, Heather Smith, Martin Parkinson and yours truly.

A confession here: Chateau Shanahan contributed the 2002 and 2003 vintages, but John Glaetzer had given these to us some years back – we’d seldom tasted John’s Blend, so entered the tasting with few preconceptions.

We tasted the wines in pairs from oldest to youngest, therefore starting with the 1990 and 1991 and finishing at 2006. It’s an effective tasting method as there’s no rush, no palate overload and a natural pairing of wine with food.

We found wonderful consistency of style across the vintages – the thread linking all of the wines being a distinctive mint-eucalypt note associated with cabernet sauvignon from Langhorne Creek.

The wines go through an interesting transition from oakiness to fruitiness as they age. In the fully mature wines, oak seems barely detectable; and in the young vintages it’s an oak-fruit arm wrestle – a style that’s not in vogue today.

In this regard, the wines reminded me of a tasting, with Wolf Blass and John Glaetzer, of all the Wolf Blass Black Label wines a few years back. The veteran tasters, remembering the dark, oaky young Black Labels of the mid seventies, wondered where the oak had gone. All we could taste now were supple, mellow old wines with fruit to the fore.

Similarly, John’s Blend reminds us that it’s all a matter of balance – powerful fruit’s capable of gobbling up lots of oak over time, and the symbiotic combination produces complex long-lived wines.

John Glaetzer says there’s been no significant change to his winemaking technique or oak-maturation regime over the years. He ferments the wine a little cooler than industry standard, to preserve vibrant fruit flavours. He believes warm temperatures “boil off the fruit”.

And in a technique picked up from Wolf Blass (in turn learned by Blass from Grange creator, Max Schubert) Glaetzer finishes the ferments off in oak barrels.

Glaetzer continues to source fruit from Bill Potts’ Langhorne Creek Vineyard. However, in 1992 and 1993 he and Potts established the 32-hectare Pasquin vineyard nearby. In recent years, says Glaetzer, John’s Blend comes about 50:50 from the two vineyards. He makes only 1,000 cases of John’s Blend each year – but made none in 2011 for lack of suitable fruit.

Langhorne Creek, near Lake Alexandrina (south east of McLaren Vale), is one of Australia’s largest premium wine grape regions. A massive expansion there in the late nineties saw most of its fruit blended anonymously into multi-region blends. Blass reputedly called the region, “Australia’s middle palate”.

The Potts family pioneered the area from 1850 and remain in control today of Bleasdale Winery and vineyards. Bill Potts, one of the family, supplies Glaetzer from his own vineyard.

One of the most enduring reds from the area is Stonyfell Metala Shiraz Cabernet. It was made from 1932 by Jack Kilgour, and marketed originally as Stonyfell Private Bin Claret. Kilgour’s successor, Bryan Dolan, put the vineyard name, Metala, on the label. Dolan won the inaugural Jimmy Watson Trophy in 1962 with the 1961 Metala, the first vintage to bear the new label.

Langhorne Creek triumphed again in 1974, 1975 and 1976 with Wolf Blass’s historic Jimmy Watson trophy hat trick. But Blass’s powerful branding of his Black Label overshadowed the regional credentials.

In John’s Blend, Langhorne Creek cabernet sauvignon reveals its idiosyncratic charm consistently across the decades, with little peaks and troughs driven by vintage variations. With so much focus now on regional specialties, Glaetzer’s 37-year-old brand (like Kilgour’s 1932 Stonyfell Private Bin Claret) reminds us that this is not a new idea at all, but the perennial wine theme.

The current-release 2007 vintage John’s Blend (not in the tasting) is available at Jim Murphy’s for $29.95 and Kemeny’s of Sydney offer the 2006 at $29.99. Few wines at this price offers such a pedigree and proven long-term cellaring potential.

John’s Blend No 17 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 1990
A perfect start to the tasting with this mature but still lively, sweet-fruited vintage with distinctive Langhorne Creek minty-eucalypt cabernet sauvignon to the fore. Has years ahead of it.

John’s Blend No 18 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 1991
Looked, smelled and tasted older than the vibrant 1990 to its left, but nevertheless an appealing, if fading, old wine.

John’s Blend No 20 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 1993
Tasted at the end of the lunch when our host, Warwick McKibbin, generously retrieved a magnum from the cellar. 1993 was a wet, disease-ridden vintage, comparable to 2011. But the wine defied the vintage stereotype, with its complex aroma and lean, taut palate still revealing mint-eucalyptus varietal flavour. Drying out a bit but still thoroughly enjoyable.

John’s Blend No 21 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 1994
One of the standout vintages, seventeen years old but still red rather than brown with vibrant mint-eucalypt cabernet aroma and a juicy, elegant palate, finely-sculpted palate. Many years left.

John’s Blend No 22 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 1995
One of the most talked about wines, championed by Charlotte Galloway and notable for its strident, chunky style, flanked on either side by the elegant 1994 and 1996 vintages. The mint-eucalypt character seemed particularly strong in this wine, matched by a firmer tannin structure.

John’s Blend No 23 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 1996
My favourite drinking wine on the day, a particularly elegant, ethereal expression of its style – all sweet fruit, grace and suppleness. Long and delicious finish, many years of life ahead, but right now showing both youth and maturity.

John’s Blend No 24 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 1997
A lesser vintage but in terrific condition, its lively palate notably leaner than the 1996 before it, but still sweet and supple.

John’s Blend No 25 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 1998
Generally considered a great vintage but our first bottle seriously cork tainted and the second bottle showing a strange vegetal character and hollow palate. John Glaetzer reckons we struck two dud corks. He regards it as one of the greats. Down with cork.

John’s Blend No 26 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 1999
A beautiful wine with a limpid, youthful colour, seductive ripe blackcurrant aroma pushing through the by now familiar mint-eucalypt. Despite the generous nose, the fruit on the palate comes teasingly wrapped in firm tannins – a delicious and elegant combination, suggesting heaps more drinking pleasure in the years to come.

John’s Blend No 27 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 2000
Looks, smells and tastes older than the exceptional 1999. Aged, autumn-leaf aromas join the mint-eucalypt notes and the palate seems old and tiring – a lesser vintage, remarkable that it’s still going after 11 years.

John’s Blend No 28 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 2001
A bit of a closed shop this one, some chocolate joining the mint-eucalypt theme on a full but tight, tannic palate ­– though there’s fruit peeking through and probably a long life ahead of it. Seems to be neither young nor mature, so best left for a few more years.

John’s Blend No 29 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 2002
First bottle cork tainted. Second bottle in good condition and just a baby – the first wine to show obvious oak aroma and flavour (the older wines had simply gobbled up all the oak, leaving fruit to star). A lovely aroma combining mint-eucalypt with cedary oak – these characters come through, too, on the tightly-bound palate. One of the greats but best left to mature for a few more years.

John’s Blend No 30 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 2003
We’re now squarely among the young, oaky wines. Ripe mint-eucalypt-chocolate-blackcurrant fruit joins the oak but there’s not the length of flavour. It needs more time but probably won’t rate among the best.

John’s Blend No 31 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 2004
Well, yum yum, this one’s saturated with fruit – and oak, too, after three years in new French and American barrels. But as the old wines demonstrate, the oak will fade over time as the wine becomes finer and the fruit steps to the front. A very good vintage.

John’s Blend No 32 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 2005
A big, ripe, crimson-rimmed wine: juicy, vibrant summer-berry flavours mingle with the regional mint-eucalypt. Big and chocolate-rich on the palate in an oak-fruit arm wrestle – but we know the winner in the long run, don’t we.

John’s Blend No 33 Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon 2006
A magnificent, deeply coloured, crimson-rimmed wine to finish. Enough oak to build a weekender, but in a complex matrix with deep, ripe varietal fruit (yes, tinted with mint-eucalypt). There’s great depth to the supple fruit and despite the wine’s youth and power, the structure’s poised and elegant. One of the greats.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2011

Lark Hill triumphs in difficult vintage

In a vintage plagued by mildew and botrytis outbreaks, biodynamic Lark Hill, like several traditionally managed Canberra vineyards, overcame the vine diseases and ultimately harvested good quantities of healthy grapes.

During our post-vintage visit to Lark Hill, David and Sue Carpenter and son Chris seem relaxed, perhaps relieved to have all the good stuff bubbling away in the winery. There’s a fair bit of it, too, says David Carpenter, estimating a yield of about six tonnes a hectare – double 2009’s crop and significantly up on 2010. It’s a wonderful outcome for a vineyard at 860 metres in a cool, wet season.

The fight against disease began early, says David. In winter 2010 Australian grape growers had been warned to expect a cool, wet spring and summer – ideal conditions for mildew – “so we could see it coming”, says David, “and commenced a protective regime”.

That meant spraying before outbreaks of mildew, beginning very early in the season with cupric oxide (permitted in biodynamic farming). “By doing it early we used only a little bit of spray on a small target”, says David. Later in the season sprays included a canola base with tee tree and, after fruiting, copper based spray followed by a biodynamic preparation aimed at building up natural predators.

While spraying can kill mildew spoors, a long-term regime aims at building healthy soils and strong, resistant plants – based on “spraying the vineyard with various preparations and endless involvement with deep composting”.

Even in traditional viticulture “spraying makes up only about 20 per cent of the arsenal against mildew – the rest’s vineyard management”, says David. He’s referring to practices like shoot and leaf thinning and hedging vines to maximise air circulation and allow penetration of sunlight.

The Carpenters say their commitment to biodynamics began at a conference in 2003 at Beechworth. Sue recalls “lots of arms folded tightly across chests”, theirs included, at the beginning, but a rush to sign up towards the end – sparked largely by a visit to Julian Castagna’s magnificent vineyard.

In their current newsletter, the Carpenters write, “from inception, we avoided insecticides and steered a careful path utilising biological controls wherever possible, but it is in the last eight years that we have fully entered the totally biodynamic regime”.

Biodynamics is sort of like organics with the added principles espoused by Rudolph Steiner. This includes the use of seemingly mysterious biodynamic preparations, numbered from 500 to 508, and adherence to the lunar calendar – practices, write the Carpenters, that some “regard with the deepest suspicion”. They add, “we assure you our attire has not progressed to sandals and loin cloths”.

However, a big part of biodynamics, certainly as practised by the Carpenters, appears to be giving tremendous attention to care of the land and vines. Who can argue against composting, deep mulching and keeping potentially hazardous chemicals out of the environment.

The more astrological components of biodynamics, such as planting, harvesting and racking wine by phases of the moon draws derision and satire from some quarters. And there’s much scepticism regarding the 500-series preparations – particularly regarding the legendary the cow horn full of dung – sometimes scoffed at as a belief in channelling cosmic forces.

But even scientists like the Carpenters have to stick with the Steiner precepts to be accredited as biodynamic producers – which they have been from vintage 2008.

They explain, for example, that the cow horn of dung isn’t about channelling cosmic or any other forces. It’s the beginning of breeding program for useful bacteria and fungal spores. It’s the base for the “500” preparation. Each autumn they fill the horns with cow dung, seal them with clay and bury them in shallow pits on beds of compost.

In spring they dig up the horns and use the dung as a starter culture in warm rainwater – adding 50 grams to every 200 litres and aerating it. The theory is that at around body temperature the bacteria and spores breed rapidly. The Carpenters then spray the mix around the vineyard where the microbes fix nitrogen in the soil and spores stimulate growth of fungi that enjoy a symbiotic relationship with the vines.

Whatever we make of the more arcane elements of biodynamics, the Lark Hill vineyard looks a treat and is delivering probably the best wines since the Carpenters began planting it in 1978.

Across the years they’ve seen what works and what doesn’t. As a result, they’ve pared the vineyard back to the proven varieties, riesling, chardonnay and pinot noir. And following a suggestion from Jancis Robinson, a visit to Austria tasting gruner veltliner – and the fortuitous discovery of two vines of the variety in Tasmania – propagated a thousand vines and planted them in 2006.

Gruner veltliner, say the Carpenters gives them a high-quality white that sits in style somewhere between the delicacy of riesling and opulence of chardonnay.

Like all of their table wines, bar riesling, it’s fermented by indigenous yeasts. Unfortunately the sensational 2010 sold out recently. But, says Chris Carpenter, the 2011 (still a lovely, sweet, acidic juice when I visited) will be released around October.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2011

Canberra’s Eden Road buys Doonkuna Estate

Last week Chris Coffman’s Eden Road Wines took over Doonkuna Estate, one of Canberra’s oldest vineyards. The purchase lands Eden Road plum in Murrumbateman’s reputation-making shiraz and riesling belt – giving the vineyard perhaps its best hope in nearly forty years.

Doonkuna’s history of hope, death and almost making it, began in 1972 when Wing Commander Harvey Smith established the first vines. Smith sold the property to Sir Brian and Lady Jane Murray in 1978. The Murray’s built a winery in 1980 and made their first estate-grown wines in 1981.

But the Murray’s tenure, too, proved comparatively short, and interrupted by Sir Brian’s term as Governor of Victoria. After he died in 1991, Lady Janet continued the business for a time, but in 1996 sold to pathologist, Dr Barry Moran and wife Maureen.

With great energy and vision, Moran and family expanded the vineyard sixfold and built a new winery and cellar door. Despite these efforts, however, Doonkuna’s wines still lagged the quality of Canberra’s best when Moran died in 2009.

But Eden Road winemaker Nick Spencer sees great potential in the vineyard, located on granite soils, similar to those at Clonakilla and other proven sites nearby.

We always had a long-term plan to look for a vineyard and build a winery in the district”, he says. And when Doonkuna came on the market it proved almost a perfect fit.

It’s in a plum location, has mature vines and there’s a well-equipped winery with capacity to process around 500 tonnes of grapes (equivalent to around 35 thousand dozen bottles).

There’s something exciting about Murrumbateman in general”, says Spencer. “It’s a special feeling walking up and down rows of vines every day, getting to know them intimately. It helps quality and it’s an inspiration. We need to have a home and it’s very exciting having our own patch of soil and trying to express a sense of place”.

Even before last week’s settlement, Eden Road had begun moving wine barrels from its old home in Elvin Group’s Kamberra complex, Watson, to Doonkuna. But the main game, once they’ve moved the tanks of bulk wine, will be in restructuring the vineyard.

Spencer expects to halve the current plantings of around 14 hectares to around seven or eight, “focusing almost entirely on shiraz and riesling, with a touch of viognier”.

The half that’s coming out lies in a frost hollow, so nothing can save them. But the vines, many of them mature, are in generally in good shape. Spencer expects in reshaping the vineyard to graft rather than replant, especially among the older vines.

Though he expects to commence vineyard work this winter, Spencers says they’ll look carefully at the whole vineyard before restructuring.

Even with its own vineyard, though, Eden Road intends to continue sourcing grapes from growers in Canberra and surrounding regions. Spencer sees great excitement in material from Canberra, Hilltops, Tumbarumba and the Southern Highlands.

Though Hardys left the area five years ago, he says they left two lasting legacies: vines planted by numerous growers, originally to meet Hardy’s needs; and grape growing know-how as they taught growers how to manage vineyards for wine production. He adds that as these vines mature, they’re contribution to a huge improvement in local wine quality.

And while shiraz and riesling remain the main game in Canberra, he points to the white viognier as an important niche variety. Small amounts co-fermented with shiraz contribute to fragrance and structure.

But he says, “Canberra is an exciting area for viognier. Here you can pick it early while the acid’s still high and it still has varietal flavour – this is special. It means you can make nice tight wines”. Elsewhere, he says, it tends to deliver flavour at high sugar levels, meaning big, soft, sometimes oily wines.

And Tumbarumba he singles out for two varieties, chardonnay and pinot noir. The area already enjoys a strong and growing reputation for taut, long-lived table wines made from chardonnay. But pinot has been principally grown for sparkling. He believes this is changing.

Spencer attributes the big price difference between Tumbarumba chardonnay and pinot noir to the earlier recognition of chardonnay as a table wine variety.

This probably dates back to Southcorp’s “white Grange” project, to make the best white it could from whatever variety or region, and a similar quest by Hardy’s with its Eileen Hardy chardonnay. Both companies included Tumbarumba chardonnay in their searches.

But Spencer believes growing demand for pinot noir will see Tumbarumba emerge as an outstanding region as growers reduce yields and change overall management in return for higher prices. The wines, he believes, will be become more concentrated and complex but “remain light and graceful and feminine”.

The beautiful wines we’ve seen from Eden Road to date suggests that Doonkuna’s vines will, at last, produce wines up there with the region’s best. And they’ll be accompanied by others from surrounding areas.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2011

The year to be adventurous”, Tim Kirk

It started with a tweet by Clonakilla’s Tim Kirk, “It may not look like much but this is exciting I tell ya. Our first Tumbarumba chardonnay… 1.4 tonnes of it”. Playfully, Capital Wines’ Jennie Mooney tweets back, “Are you guys bored or something?” – drawing Kirk’s response, “This is the year to be adventurous Jen, and making small batches of interesting wine is a lot of fun”.

So why is it the year to be adventurous, we ask Tim Kirk, and what the hell are you doing out there? “We’re turning a negative into a positive in a difficult year”, he replies.

As we’ve heard a lot lately, it’s been a tough season across eastern Australia, Canberra included. The strong La Nina pattern, identified by weather forecasters last winter, crystallised into a wet, cool growing season.

The persistent wet periods brought serious outbreaks of mildew throughout the season, destroying crops in many vineyards and dramatically raising production costs through increased spraying and vineyard labour inputs.

As vintage neared, the botrytis cinerea mould arrived, wreaking more damage in some vineyards – but creating opportunities in others. Canberra vignerons therefore moved into vintage with a nervous eye on the weather and a fervent desire for sunshine and warmth, even heat.

If the sun failed to bear down with the heat loved by our local darling, shiraz, sufficient sunshine and warmth ripened most of the fruit remaining on vines. But the cool, wet season, in general, favoured whites more than reds. It also meant better prospects than usual for varieties that prefer really cool ripening conditions – pinot noir and chardonnay in particular.

The cool, wet season, then, provides the main rationale for Kirk’s vintage adventures. We’ll no doubt hear more stories from other wineries as the ferments settle down. But Clonakilla’s seasonal extras provide a good snapshot of the peculiarities.

This year, says Kirk, the season favoured pinot noir and chardonnay in his own vineyards. Then, serendipitously, Tumbarumba chardonnay grower, Steve Morrison, offered fruit from his vineyard at 730 metres above sea level.

The offer seemed too good to be true, says Kirk. Morrison said he’d send the fruit if Kirk paid the freight and to buy the fruit only if he liked it. But Kirk wouldn’t do business like that. He visited the vineyard over the weekend and tasted the “amazing” fruit. On Monday 1.4 tonnes arrived at the winery, setting off a train of tweets.

Kirk says the Tumbarumba chardonnay – in two barrels (600 litre and 228 litre) – sits beside a small quantity from Clonakilla’s vineyard. “It’s looking interesting this year”, says Kirk.

Kirk feels a new enthusiasm for chardonnay thanks to the taut, minerally, elegant styles now being made by some Australian producers, including Oakridge, Shadowfax, Hardys, Penfolds and Coldstream Hills.

He’s hopeful the Tumbarumba material might be in this mould. But if it’s not, we’ll never see it under a Clonakilla label, he adds.

Kirk loves great pinot noir, too. When he says, “I’ve observed and shared the frustrations of those who’ve made it almost but not quite good enough”, you know he wouldn’t be ramping up production this year without some hope of success.

Tim Kirk’s father, John, planted a small amount of pinot noir in 1978 and, in most years, Clonakilla makes about one barrel. Kirk generally blends this into the shiraz-viognier.

Then in 2004–05, Kirk planted another 500 vines on an east-facing slope of a vineyard he owns with wife, Lara. For the first time this year it cropped well. With fruit, some from the original plantings and a little from the neighbouring Long Rail Gully vineyard, he made 12 barrels.

Kirk seems hopeful of this “fruit from a monumentally cool season. It’s in very good French oak, 25 per cent new, and I’m watching it with intense interest”. He adds, he love to make a half-decent, succulent, juicy pinot. But it won’t appear under a Clonakilla unless it measures up.

While botrytis can be a great destroyer, on occasion it helps concentrate sugars, acid and flavour in local rieslings. Several makers, including Clonakilla, intend turning these disgusting looking, rotten grapes into golden nectar this year.

Kirk says Clonakilla’s last was in 1991 when his father made two versions labelled as spaetlese and auslese. He says this year’s pump-clogging, sticky juice achieved auslese-level sugars.

Clonakilla’s fourth adventure in 2011, though, presents a paradox. For the first time they’re making a grenache – a southern Rhone Valley style more likely to perform in hot, dry conditions, not in the cold and wet.

Kirk says his father, loving Rhone Valley grenache-based reds like Chateauneuf-du-Pape, planted small amounts of grenache, mourvedre and cinsault. A couple of days after I talk to Kirk, winemaker Bryan Martin tweets about the lovely grenache coming into the winery, adding “John’s mourvedre and cinsault”.

Shortly after, Tim Kirk tweets, “John and Julia [his parents] were out picking the grenache yesterday. Looks good”.

And what’s the grenache role model? Chateau Rayas, says Kirk, “The greatest grenache there is in my experience”. He’s referring to an all-grenache Chateauneuf-du-Pape made by the Reynaud family and regarded as the greatest (and most expensive) of the region.

Perhaps that’s a long stretch for vintage one. But by knowing the world’s best, wineries like Clonakilla become their own most relentless critics – and that’s what leads to such profoundly good wines.

But on the way to that destination they’re being adventurous, having fun and making terrific wines for us to enjoy.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2011

Such tweet wine

A few weeks back an American bloke, Rick Bakas, wandered around Australian wine regions looking like he couldn’t believe his own good luck. Feted by the media and trade, Bakas sipped his way through the Hunter, Barossa and Yarra valleys, leading a series of global Tweet-ups.

He’s a guru, apparently, billed by Wine Communicators of Australia Inc as “one of the world’s foremost social media experts” and “a leader in wine communications in the digital age”.

The hype set off our sceptometer. But it also kindled our curiosity. Could social media, especially Twitter, really help take Australian wine to the world ­– or even to other Australians?

The answer, say several wineries and marketers, is yes, definitely. But like any facet of marketing, to succeed it needs to be part of a structure that ultimately delivers people what they want.

An instigator of the “Tweet-ups”, Trish Barry, of Mastermind Consulting, views the Bakas visit as a catalyst, fusing together a train of international activity. Importantly, says Barry, the activities led directly to sales of Hunter, Barossa and Yarra wines across the USA and sparked a possibly long tail of enquiries about these unique regional specialties.

Since creating awareness of Australian regional wine styles is the industry’s holy grail (major export markets know little or nothing of Australian wine regions) the value of this sort of activity could be significant.

Barry says the raw figures of the Tweet-ups tell only part of the story. It’s impressive that 2.92 million people followed the tour on Twitter. And it’s impressive, too, that 1,022 individuals tweeted 6,381 times.

But the true marketing success story lies in how Bakas and the Australian organisers lined up their ducks – who they recruited to the cause and, of crucial importance, their involvement of American retailer, Wholefood Markets.

They recruited Bakas, says Barry, because of his reach and influence among wine drinkers in the USA. Importantly, Bakas’s 50,000 Twitter followers and 5,000 Facebook friends included a number of other influential Twitterers and bloggers.

With help from Bakas and other sources, the Australian team identified then recruited several influential digital commentators – bypassing mainstream wine critics, including the influential Robert M. Parker. They then sent samples of regional wines and tasting notes in preparation for the Australian tastings.

Bakas also helped bring Wholefood Markets to the party. Unlike Australia’s large liquor retailers, says Barry, Wholefoods embraces social media. And with 1.8 million Twitter followers and 500 thousand Facebook friends, they began promoting Yarra, Barossa and Hunter wines ahead of the tweet-ups down under.

Barry says the retail connection completed the cycle: producers brought wines to the regional tastings and the tweets flowed freely. The tweets created interest in the regions and wines. And wine drinkers interested in the regions were able to buy at Wholefood outlets.

The tour lasted about two weeks. But the tweet-ups and associated master classes on YouTube continue to generate enquiries direct to producers from American retailers, restaurants and consumers, says Barry – setting the scent for long-term commercial connections.

Barry laments the absence of a major retailer in the Australian social-media scene. She says last year’s rose revolution – a Twitter campaign led by De Bortoli and joined by eighty wineries, including five from Canberra – created significant consumer interest in high-quality, dry roses.

The increased consumer interest drove significant sales in participating wineries and restaurants. De Bortolis reportedly sold a year’s supply in three months. But retailers missed the opportunity, probably disappointing some of their customers as well.

Jennie Mooney, the marketing voice of Canberra’s Capital Wines, says Twitter delivers huge benefits for her business. In a recent Wine Business Monthly article, she tore into Professor Larry Lockshin, head of UniSA’s marketing school, for his article, “Anti-social media”, published in the October 2010 edition.

Mooney says Lockshin had argued that Twitter was mainly about the trade talking to each other. It was therefore a substitute for traditional communications channels and not good for generating new buyers.

Mooney countered this with, “I’m trade and I buy wine – don’t other wineries buy wine too? I have also made a lot of friends on Twitter. Wineries, restaurants and others right across Australia; right across the world actually! By getting to know restaurateurs via Twitter, we are not just another winery making cold calls to their restaurant.

Most of our stockists came from Twitter – certainly all of our interstate restaurants, our east coast distributor and our Western Australian distributor are all new buyers due to Twitter. As well as trade, we have lots of consumers buying our wine and new members in our cellar club. I have sent our wine to people around the world and am in the process of talking to several potential distributors regarding export. October sales from Twitter were just over 3 pallets, which is significant for a small winery like ours”.

Mooney also talks at length of the power Twitter gives her to build direct relationships and trust with customers – and in the turn the direct voice this gives to her customers. These sentiments were echoed, too, by David Brookes, marketing manager of Teusner Wines, Barossa Valley, and Leanne De Bortoli, a principal of De Bortoli, Yarra Valley.

These wineries all agree, too, that Twitter isn’t a magic bullet. It’s just part of the marketing mix. For a tiny winery like Capital Wines, it’s a big part of the mix; and for a large operator like De Bortoli, a small but growing part.

Several marketers and wineries also agreed that Twitter leans more to business than private use, though many individuals participate by following others or tweeting their own views.

Trish Barry says the average age of Twitter users is 39 and users tend to be people who were early adopters of Facebook. One recent estimate, based on Google analysis, puts the number of active, unique Twitter users in Australia at 1.1 million – far short of our 9.4 million Facebook users.

This suggests the majority of readers of this column use Facebook but few use Twitter. In all likelihood, then, most of us missed all the recent chirping from the Barossa, Yarra and Hunter valleys. But whether we tweet or not, it’s there, it’s growing and it gives us direct access to people who grow and make wine for us.

@ChateauShanahan

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2011

Last fling for pedro ximenez — a curio worth tasting

Pedro ximenez probably isn’t on the radar of most wine drinkers. And where we see the name, it’s probably on the label of a dark, sweet, sherry. But it exists as a delicate, long-lived dry white wine as well. And there’s a dwindling but significant treasure trove of it at Campbells of Rutherglen.

It seems hard to believe now, but this Spanish white grape once starred in Australia’s wine industry. Brought to Sydney by James Busby in 1832, pedro ximenez spread to our hot, dry growing regions, including Rutherglen, Victoria. A century later it underpinned production of Australian “sherry”, much of it destined for the UK.

Rutherglen became an important production centre, with two of Australia’s largest producers and exporters located there. Winemaker Colin Campbell recalls Seppelt, at Rutherglen, and Lindemans, at nearby Corowa, New South Wales, being “based on sherry soleras”.

But by 1968, when Campbell returned to the family business from winemaking studies at Roseworthy College, fortified wine, including sherry, had begun its long decline, and table consumption was on the rise.

To meet growing demand for dry white wine, Campbell turned to the only two white varieties in the family vineyard – pedro ximenez and trebbiano. Both had been planted for sherry production and their fruit sold to Lindemans.

He says the pedro vines had probably been planted between 1900 and 1908, by his grandfather, David Campbell, son of the property’s founder, John Campbell.

Like other Victorian grape growers, the Campbells lost their original vines to phylloxera – the small but deadly American vine pest that also devastated European vineyards in the late nineteenth century.

To relieve distress among grape growers, says Campbell, the Victorian government despatched Francois de Castella to Europe. There he sourced vines, including pedro, grafted onto phylloxera-resistant rootstock. David Campbell’s new plantings came from de Castella’s material.

Campbell installed refrigeration at the winery and set about making a dry white pedro ximenez. Picked early, with comparatively low sugar and high acidity, the wine began life austere and dry, but developed greater richness and character with bottle age.

However, a run of wine show successes failed to spark interest in the variety. Incredulous winemakers, including Leo Buring’s John Vickery, laughed in wonder but stuck with established table wine varieties.

Vickery, the father of modern Australian riesling – an experienced sherry maker, too, using pedro ximenez in Buring’s popular Florita Flor sherry) – rightly dismissed pedro as a curio.

Campbell says bottled aged pedros invariably spark a similar reaction from drinkers ¬– scepticism before tasting, followed by an incredulous smile. I’ve been there twice. The first time, about eight years ago, on a retail buying trip, we tasted 20 or so vintages. The earlier wines carried “Chablis” labels, in line with generic naming of a past era; but from the late eighties carried the varietal name, pedro ximenez. What surprisingly delicious and delicate old wine they were. More recently, a lovely, fresh, delicate, slightly honeyed 1999 vintage, served at a dinner party, prompted a call to the winery, and this article.

Curio or not, pedro succeeded for Campbell’s from the late sixties until production ceased after the 2007 vintage. Colin Campbell says, “We stopped then because it was a curio and because we only made a small volume, it was difficult to handle”.

He says pedro shoots early, making it prone to damage from spring frosts. And the big berries tend to swell and burst in rain, or rot and fall off. However, pedro vines remain in the vineyard and now contribute to cheaper sweet fortified wines. Campbell says these vines are descendents of those established by his grandfather a century ago – the vineyard having been replanted in the mid 1990s.

While the winery discontinued production after 2007, Campbell expects stock to be available at the cellar door for some years as they’ve always released it as an aged wine. Because it’s so acidic and austere as a young wine, explains Campbell, “it needs at least five to six years to develop bottle age character. And it also needs cork character to age properly”.

But using cork exposes the wine to two risks – cork taint and random oxidation. And oxidation, laments Campbell, takes a massive toll, rendering up to 60 per cent of older pedros unsaleable. He says they destroy bottles that fail pre-release assessment.

Campbell’s dry, white pedro ximenez remains a curio – but a loveable, mellow and drinkable one, at a refreshingly low 11.5 per cent alcohol. Unfortunately, it’s destined for extinction.

But there’s still time to enjoy it. Campbells currently offer at cellar door the 1997 vintage for $35 and the 2004 vintage for $25.90. And all of the vintages from 1998 to 2007 remain in the cellar for future release. It’s history in a bottle.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2011
First published 6 April 2011 in The Canberra Times
Published in The Melbourne Age Epicure 26 July 2011

Blind tasting sharpens the senses

Nothing de-romanticises wine like TV footage of white-clad show judges spitting perfectly good wine into buckets. It just seems so far removed from the simple enjoyment of wine with food.

Certainly wine judging holds little appeal for spectators. But for judges it opens the door ever wider on the vast world of wine. And, from experience, the pleasure of drinking wine increases as our frame of reference expands.

Our frame of reference expands every time we taste a new wine. The more adventurous we become, the more we learn. And even in normal drinking situations we can move faster up the ladder by doing little things like serving wine in pairs for comparison. When we do this we become our own wine judges.

And if we conceal the bottles as we serve pairs of wine to our dinner guests, we have a masked tasting – a mini wine show. When we can’t see the bottles, don’t know what’s served and don’t know what the price is, we’re left only with our senses. Do the wines look, smell and taste good? Do they please us? Can we tell if they’re chardonnay or riesling; pinot noir or shiraz; young or old?

It’s a terrific way of widening our exposure to wine in its natural setting with food. And if you’ve like-minded friends, you can take turns hosting wine-tasting dinners. It’s a great way of throwing the wine door wide open.

For a decade now we’ve been part of a tasting group that formed some years earlier. Six couples gather six times a year – each couple hosting one event annually.

The host couple prepares a main meal and select and buy the wine. The others in the group bring a plate and their own glasses and contribute money for the wine. But the wine selection is entirely up to the host. And none of the other guests, and generally the wine buyer’s partner, don’t know what’s on the wine list.

We kick off with an aperitif as people arrive, usually a sparkler or sherry from a masked bottle or decanter. Between the chitchat, we offer comments on the wine, often prompted by questions from the host – simple stuff like “is it Australian or imported?”, “OK, it’s imported, do you think it’s French?” And so it goes until the wrapper comes off.

At the dinner table, the wines arrive in decanters, usually in sets of three but sometimes in pairs. We launch into the food, two or three glasses of wine in front of every person.

By now we’re well into a rollicking dinner party for 12 – and the conversation goes everywhere. Prompted by the host’s questions, though, it eventually returns to wine. We compare the wines, describe them and gradually drill down to what they are, led by the host’s questioning and acknowledgment of correct answers. Some folks pay more attention than others. But it doesn’t matter. We’re all enjoying the wines.

We’re all learning something, too. And we’re all put on the spot, in gentle kind of way: OK, so you have three wines in front of you. What are they? Are they all the same variety? Yes. So what are they, riesling or semillon?

The latter question came up at our most recent gathering. We had in front of us a pair of very dry, acidic whites, the first quite austere, the second a little more fruity. Only one taster spotted riesling (correctly) at first glance and held steady throughout the quiz. The rest of equivocated, thrown off by the austerity of the wines.

The first was Eden Road Canberra District Riesling 2010 – a pale, low-alcohol, bone dry white that may or may not develop richer flavour over time. It’d be an act of faith to expect so. But this is a respected winemaker, so we can’t write off the chances. The second wine was Helm Classic Riesling 2010.

After this unexciting start, though, the second pair of whites threw riesling into perspective. Here was the value of masked tasting, a couple of sniffs and sips bringing instant enlightenment, and huge drinking pleasure.

The first wine offered a beautiful fragrance – floral and excitingly limey at the same time, followed by the most delicate, pure lime-like flavour and zingy, fresh acidity. This was pure, distinctive Watervale – a sub-region of South Australia’s Clare Valley.

Its companion offered a more powerful expression of riesling, less revealing of its fruit flavour but with the structure and fine but intense acid backbone of Polish Hill, another Clare sub-regions.

What classics they were and so readily identifiable – a mark of great regional specialties. The wines were Grosset Springvale Vineyard Watervale Riesling 2010 and Grosset Polish Hill Riesling 2010 – Australia’s most revered rieslings.

We moved on to reds and after a pair of mediocre pinot noirs, one from Willamette Valley Oregon, the other from Coal River Valley Tasmania, enjoyed two more pairs of beautiful regional specialties.

The group fairly quickly honed in on the glorious Best’s Bin O Shiraz 2005 and Seppelt St Peter’s Vineyard Shiraz 2005 – spicy, savoury wines from neighbouring vineyards at Great Western, in Victoria’s Grampians region.

Then Cullens elegant, refined Cabernet Merlot 2008 and Moss Wood’s powerful Ribbon Vale Cabernet Merlot 2008 provided contrasting, but recognisable, examples of this great Margaret River style.

Of course, we can drink and enjoy these wines on their own. But serving them in masked pairs or trios, selected by someone else, increases the mystery, sharpens our senses, challenges our assumptions and ultimately widens our experience. Indeed, the more adventurous we become the more we enjoy ourselves.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 2011