Rothbury Estate — part two of two: Foster’s Mildara Blass takes over

Last week we looked back over Rothbury Estate’s origins, from its idealistic start in 1968, at its early struggles, at enforced pragmatism that saw production focus shift from Hunter Valley shiraz to Cowra
chardonnay, at its public float and, finally at its takeover by Mildara Blass and the fresh breeze blowing through what now appears to have been a stale old business in need of a good shakeup.

Adam Eggins, now in charge of the Rothbury winery, says that after the takeover by Mildara Blass, two senior wine makers were dismissed and two juniors promoted. Then the juniors jumped ship just before the 1997 vintage.

At the time, Eggins was group sparkling-wine maker, based at the Yellowglen Winery in Victoria. He was asked to take up the reins in the Hunter.

Freshly-recruited red-wine maker Robert Guadagnini (ex Brown Bros) and Eggins saw the 1997 vintage through, then focused on a re-vamp of the winery.

Eggins says that  in terms of winery fittings “Rothbury didn’t do much in the last ten years of its life” (before the Mildara Blass takeover).

Much of the equipment was old, inefficient and poorly-suited to the small-batch production Eggins sees as necessary for the new vision. Indeed, several outdoor wine-storage tanks had no refrigeration and held wine, Eggins says, at potentially-damaging temperatures of up to forty five degrees celsius.

Red fermentation vats were the wrong shape to maximise colour, tannin and flavour extraction as well as being poorly located within the winery; and white fermenters were too large to handle individual-vineyard grape batches.

Juice chilling  and pressing facilities were inadequate and fermentation solids and skins were being pumped (and therefore compressed with potential wine-flavour implications) over considerable distances to presses.

Refitting of the winery is under way. $1.3 million dollars has been invested to date and another $1.4 million is to be spent this year. Eggins says, “It’s all about long-term investment for potential national and international brands. We spend to accommodate the quality required”.

Investment is geared towards the production of discrete parcels of wine from numerous vineyards. Part of that strategy has seen the discarding of the old forty tonne fermenters in favour of ten tonne units.

Rothbury’s new vision is based on historical connections in the Cowra, Mudgee and Hunter Valley regions of New South Wales. And if some of the sentimentality has gone from Rothbury, the passion to make great wines is alive, well and (n my view) has every chance of success under Mildara Blass wine makers Adam Eggins and Robert Guadagnini.

The pair have not only the passion and skill to make great wines, but a hard-nosed marketing team, top viticulturists, good vineyards, adequate capital and the right wine-making equipment to create long-term success.

Rothbury’s range now focuses on three price points and three regions. There’s the $10  ‘NSW regional range’: Cowra Chardonnay, Mudgee Cabernet Merlot and Mudgee Shiraz; the $15 ‘Hunter Valley range’: Hunter Semillon, Hunter Verdelho and Hunter Shiraz; and the $20 Brokenback range: a  Shiraz, Semillon and Chardonnay from the company’s vineyard at the foot of the Brokenback Range in the Pokolbin district of the lower Hunter.

Eggins’ sparkling-wine experience transfers beautifully to semillon, the Hunter’s highly-individual, wonderful white. Both sparkling wine base and Hunter semillon require gentle handling and controlled ferments to capture delicate flavours.

Eggins’ first efforts with the variety, from the 1997 and 1998 vintages, show the benefits of that gentle touch. And, of course, the single-vineyard Brokenback wines, from old, low-yielding vines on sandy soil, show tremendous varietal and regional flavour.

Perhaps the challenge will be greater for Robert Guadagnini as he comes to grip with the idiosyncratic Hunter shiraz. I don’t like the 1995 Reserve Shiraz, I think it is overoaked. But Robert inherited that from the previous owners and was involved only in the final maturation, blending and bottling stages.

The base reds from the 1998 vintage appear outstanding — particularly, full, rich and fleshy for Hunter wines. The trick for Guadagnini will be in getting the oak-maturation stage right. Balancing oak and fruit seems to be particularly difficult in the Hunter. I strongly suspect that little, if any, new oak should be used. Still, that’s Robert’s call. He’s a good wine maker and he’s certainly talking to other more experienced makers in the area.

Despite the worst fears of some that the wines might all end up in giant blending vats, Rothbury’s focus is back on regional wine specialties including the highly idiosyncratic Hunter styles. The dust from the
takeover has barely settled yet, but I’d say Rothbury is in good hands.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 1998 & 2007

Rothbury Estate — part one of two: the Len Evans’ years

In 1996, Foster’s-owned Mildara Blass acquired Rothbury Estate, just four years after it went public.

Foster’s advances had not been welcomed by Rothbury Chairman, Len Evans. Many small shareholders shared Len’s wariness. With a soft spot for Len’s exuberance and fond memories of the wine-loving origins of the venture, they wondered where the hostile takeover might take Rothbury.

Would it become just another brand to sit alongside Wolf Blass, Yellowglen and Jamieson’s Run in the Mildara Blass portfolio? Would production of the small-volume, idiosyncratic Hunter wines continue? Would the popular mail-order wine club continue?

Indeed, Rothbury Estate’s history and personality were so strongly linked to Len, it seemed hard to imagine a Rothbury — let alone a better Rothbury (and that’s what’s emerging) — without him.

Len seemed to combine a romantic view and love of wine with hard-nosed, pragmatic entrepreneurial skills. As a founding father of Rothbury, Len watched his baby crawl, totter, stumble, walk and grow.

From being a Lower-Hunter specialist in 1968 Rothbury became a non-listed public company
in 1974, shifted its focus from the Hunter to Cowra in purchasing a large chardonnay vineyard there in 1981 and, after a public float in 1992, became the centrepiece of an operation including Baileys and St Hubert’s wineries in Victoria.

Prior to the float, St Hubert’s and Bailey’s belonged to the Goodman Fielder Wattie Group. When Rothbury purchased these two wineries, GFW Ingredients, a subsidiary of Goodman Fielder Wattie, acquired 19.7 per cent of the new company, making it the largest shareholder. Len Evans remained the second biggest holder with a 15 per cent stake, and another founding father, Daniel Chen, was the third biggest with 11.3 per cent.

From Rothbury’s 11 founding investors in 1968, Len Evans assumed the role of marketing director, while Murray Tyrrell looked after the vineyards. The company planted about 340 hectares, all in the lower Hunter. Gerry Sissingh made the wines. But only those passing muster with the selection panel — Len Evans, Rudy Komon, Gerry Sissingh, and Murray Tyrrell — emerged under the Rothbury label.

Rothbury’s initial production was predominantly red, a direction dictated by a short boom in red-wine drinking in the late sixties. Unfortunately for Rothbury, consumer preferences moved quickly to whites, putting the unprepared company under severe financial pressure.

Rothbury’s bacon was saved by a controversial 1981 board decision to buy an established vineyard in Cowra. It allowed Rothbury to meet an exploding demand for good-quality but inexpensive chardonnays.

It turned out that the wine-buying public was little interested in the lower Hunter’s great specialties, shiraz and semillon, varieties making up the majority of Rothbury’s Hunter plantings. Len Evans takes the credit for seeing where demand lay and persuading the board to grab Cowra.

The Cowra vineyard had been established by Tony Grey in 1972. It proved an ideal location. By the Lachlan River in central Western N.S.W. in a benign climate with plenty of water, it quickly and efficiently produced biggish crops of high-quality grapes. Evans recognised the quality early.

He was instrumental in sourcing Cowra grapes for Petaluma Chardonnay from the first vintage in 1977 until the vineyard’s acquisition by Rothbury in 1981. At the time of the purchase, Cowra was planted to a number of varieties including 12 hectares of chardonnay.

In that year Rothbury made just one thousand cases of its first Cowra chardonnay. Production increased steadily as more chardonnay went in and other varieties were pulled out. Forty two thousand cases were made in 1990, by the mid nineties production was running at about sixty thousand cases a year.

Rothbury’s production turned even more to whites with the acquisition in 1988 of Denman Estate’s vineyards in the upper Hunter. Then as tasted swung back to reds again in the nineties, Mudgee shiraz and cabernet became important.

By the mid nineties Rothbury’s Hunter plantings were down to just 63 hectares producing around 500 tonnes in good years. That was only 10 per cent of the group’s total crush, reflecting just how far from commercial reality the original Hunter dream had been.

Some might say the dream evaporated completely with the arrival of Mildara Blass in 1996. Heads rolled. And, shock horror, the flagship Hunter Reserve Shiraz was slaughtered — falling from around $30 to $15 a bottle in Sydney and Canberra retail outlets.

In fact, the old vision has been replaced by a new one. In some respects it’s more hard nosed than the old one. But, ironically, the dream of making great Hunter wines probably has more chance of succeeding under the new regime than it did under the old. That’s next week’s story.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 1998 & 2007

Aussie wine’s global focus — part three of three

This third and final of three articles on the recent expansion of overseas wine interests by Australian producers starts with one of the earliest ventures and ends with two of the newest.

In 1990 when the then family-owned Thomas Hardy and Sons acquired Domaine de la Baume in France’s Languedoc-Roussillon region, Australia’s wine industry knew little of the optimism, growth and profitability we expect today.

Producer-led discounting, even of red wines, fed steadily into the equally aggressive retail chain and from there into the welcoming cellars, cupboards and glasses of appreciative wine drinkers.

Indeed, the flatness of the domestic market was one of the driving forces behind Hardys acquisition not just of Domaine de la Baume, but also of Casa Vinicola Barone Ricasoli, in Chianti, Italy, and of two wine merchants in London.

Some time later, Bill Hardy wrote that  the family was “keen to continue expanding in order to offer increasing returns to our shareholders and interesting job opportunities to our staff”.

Europe was obviously high on our list of areas for potential investment as it is the major wine producing and consuming region in the world and has a very positive image for its wine. Europe was also of interest because we were a little uneasy about the strengthening of the EEC scheduled for 1992. We felt that we would be in a more favourable situation as a producer of wines within the EEC than as an outsider trying to sell products into the EEC. We had also noted the first cracks appearing in the Eastern bloc countries and there appeared the likelihood that the European market would expand with the opening up of these countries”.

And so the acquisitions of early 1990 gave Hardys “a distribution base in the most influential wine market in the world [UK] and production bases in the two major wine producing countries of the world.”

However, difficult times lay ahead and the vision was not to be realised immediately. When the Berri Renmano Co-operative and Thomas Hardys finally merged into the listed BRL Hardy several years later, the English and French connections remained but the Italian was  never taken into the fold.

Whiclar and Gordon Wines, Thomas Hardy’s U.K. distribution arm, became BRL Hardy Europe Ltd. By this time the decrepit la Baume winery had been gutted, re-roofed and filled with gleaming new stainless steel wine making equipment able to process, first 800,000 and, later, 1.6 million litres of wine annually.

The focus was on cabernet sauvignon, chardonnay, merlot and sauvignon blanc grapes sourced from the company’s own small vineyard and from contract growers within the vast Languedoc-Roussillon region.

The aim was to produce varietal wines, under the ‘Vins de Pays d’Oc’ appellation, for world markets. The appellation is specific to the very large Languedoc-Roussillon region, spread along the Mediterranean coast and its hinterland.

Hardy’s La Baume wines have to date enjoy little success in Australia but, according to Bill Hardy, made early and solid inroads into the less parochial, value-orientated U.K. and Scandinavian markets.

The French themselves, observes Hardy, seem a long way from recognising the quality potential of an area traditionally seen as a “producer of simple, light low-alcohol wines” — a perception being eroded gradually by the Australian influence.

That influence now includes not just BRL Hardy but Australia’s largest producer, Southcorp Wines. With Les Vignerons du Val d’Orbieu, Southcorp formed a 50:50 joint venture company — Penvale — to produce the La Perouse label for distribution in the U.K., U.S. and, later, the Chinese markets.

While Southcorp has made no capital investment in the winery or vineyards, viticulturist David Morrison works with French grape growers and the Southcorp wine making and marketing team are involved in fruit selection, wine making and style decisions.

Southcorp has also established a beach head in California through two new ventures. In a 50:50 deal with Paragon Vineyards, the Independent WineCompany was formed to produce the new Seven Peaks label.

Paragon will the Seven Peaks wines in its Edna Valley winery and Australian wine maker, Ian Shepherd (formerly of Seppelts Great Western) will move in.

And his role could expand rapidly as Southcorp’s second venture comes to fruition. Last year Southcorp bought land at Pasa Robles on California’s Central coast and is developing 250 hectares of vineyards to feed the new Seven Peaks label and to create a new brand totally owned by Southcorp.

This and the other endeavours mentioned over the last few weeks are just some of Australia’s off-shore adventures adding to the truly global influence of Australia’s extraordinarily vigorous wine-making culture.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 1998 & 2007

Aussie wine’s global focus — part two of three

In last week’s column we looked at the increasing phenomenon of Australian wine makers acquiring or developing overseas interests. Spreading risk, increasing total capacity, appealing to a wider audience, hedging against exchange-rate variations, taking advantage of lower production costs and catering for the parochial factor are just some of the driving forces behind the increasing trend to establish strategic interests off shore.

Mildara Blass (owned by Foster’s), as we saw, dipped its toe into the United States market last year via a joint venture with Golden State Vintners (GSV). Wines were made in 1997 by Mildara Blass wine makers, Adam Marks and David O’Leary, at  GSV’s Monterey winery,  using grapes bought from selected vineyards in the region.

A new and yet-to-be-named brand jointly-owned by Mildara Blass and GSV will be released on the U.S. market this year.

In a similar fifty fifty joint venture, Mildara Blass last year made wines in Chile in conjunction with Vina Santa Carolina, one of Italy’s  largest wine companies.

The venture sourced sufficient grapes from Casa Blanca and the Maipo Valley to make about fifty thousand cases of Chardonnay, Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot and Sauvignon Blanc for release in the United States  under a new brand this year.

When the United States and Chile ventures are on a commercial footing, Mildara Blass intends making small parcels of ‘reserve’ wines from the best grapes from both California and Chile.

So far the makers have been particularly impressed by the quality of Chilean grapes. And in California — knowing what’s been done in Australia with shiraz from old, bush-pruned vines — David O’Leary can hardly wait to get his hands on a special block of old zinfandel vines.

Mildara Blass’s move makes sense for a company with major international ambitions. “It’s not enough to produce wine in one country only”, said Mildara’s Stuart Gregor, adding “and you have to be involved in domestic markets because parochialism is rife”.

And if you’re a Mildara Blass shareholder, it’s probably comforting to see a comparatively low-risk,  ow-capital-investment approach being taken. Where recent expansion in Australia has come largely through large up-front shareholder investment in vineyards and wineries, the overseas joint ventures use existing capital resources.

Hopefully, we’ll see big juicy profits coming back home.

BRL Hardy takes a similar approach to Mildara’s in its two new joint ventures overseas, one in Chile, announced in December last, the other in Italy, announced only last week

The Chilean venture, a fifty-fifty deal with major Central Valley producer Jose Canepa, will see the global launch of a new brand, Mapocho, distributed through BRL’s world-wide chain. The main emphasis will be in the United Kingdom, mainland Europe and the United States.

Mapocho wines are to be made — with some help from the BRL Hardy wine-making crew — at the Jose Canepa winery (one hundred and eighty kilometres south of Santiago) using grapes from Canepa’s recently expanded vineyards.

Hardy’s other new joint venture, in Sicily, will initially focus even more sharply on Europe and particularly the UK market. The press release talks of marketing “at price points lower than those currently occupied by Australian wines”.

What this means is that having successfully established strong brands and lifted wine prices above the low-profit, commodity end of the market, BRL intends to maintain a fighting presence in the budget stakes,  under the new ‘D’istinto’ banner, through low-cost production in Sicily.

The fifty-fifty partner there is Casa Vinicola Calatrasi. Again, BRL Hardy is to provide technical input  all the way from the vineyard to the bottle. In moves paralleling what we have seen in Australia in recent years, wine makers intend setting quality standards for fruit coming into the winery, with an eye on “quality rather than quantity”, to quote BRL Hardy’s Stephen Millar.

Again, the low-capital approach to overseas production may prove fruitful for Australian shareholders, unlike Thomas Hardy and Sons earlier pre-float push into Italy, when it purchased well-known Chianti producer, Casa Vinicola Barone Ricasoli almost a decade ago. The purchase was a disaster and the winery was off loaded some time later.

At about the same time as the Ricasoli purchase, Hardys acquired ‘Domaine de la Baume’ in France’s Languedoc-Roussilon region. Success here seems to have been limited, but when Thomas Hardy and Sons was floated and joined with the old Berri Renmano Cooperative to become BRL Hardy, the French
winery (unlike the Italian one) was taken into the fold.

Domaine de la Baume today is a going concern whose time may be about to come as Australian wine making goes truly global.

This and Southcorp’s French and Californian stories will follow next week.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 1998 & 2007

Aussie wine’s global focus — part one of three

Australia’s wine exports may eventually be just the tip of the iceberg of success as our amazingly successful, vigorous wine makers go global. As well as wine, we now export technology, equipment and even viticultural skills to the rest of the world. And the next, perhaps biggest, part of the industry’s globalisation, may be in wine-making and marketing enterprises acquired or built from the ground up in other countries.

Watching our wine-export chart climb from 21.3 million litres worth $44.6m to 154.4 million litres worth $603.3m between 1986/7 and 1996/97, it’s easy to get caught up in the ‘gee whiz’ factor while losing sight of how small a player we are.

According to the industry’s ‘Strategy 2025’ published in 1996, Australia accounted then for just 2.4 per cent by volume, and 3.5 per cent by value, of world wine trade — suggesting plenty of room for growth.

But the industry’s ambitious vision of doubling grape output to grab 6.5 per cent of global trade by 2025, encouraging as it is for independent grape growers and smaller wine producers, presents a challenge to larger players with major global ambitions.

Spreading the risk, increasing total capacity, appealing to a wider audience, hedging against exchange-rate variations and catering for the parochial factor are all driving forces behind an increasing trend to establish strategic interests off shore.

There’s nothing new in the concept. France’s Moet and Chandon, part of the giant LVMH  group, for instance, long ago recognised that you cannot be all things to all people. It successfully established sparkling wine production facilities in California and Australia’s Yarra Valley.

LVMH recognised both the finite production capacity of France’s Champagne region and the limited market penetrating capacity of any one brand. Hence, today, Moet remains leading French brand in Australia while Domaine Champagne, from the Yarra Valley, sits amongst the most successful super-premium Australian brands, selling for about half the price of the French original.

An Australian expansion by Remy — owners of Remy Martin Cognac as well the Champagne houses, Krug, Charles Heidsieck and Piper Heidsieck — appears to have failed in its initial effort to create an Australia sparkling wine brand from vineyards in the Pyrenees region, Victoria.

But a complete revamping of the vineyard and a subsequent huge lift in quality may well make a success of Remy’s  ‘Blue Pyrenees Estate’ range of table and sparkling wines.

The biggest  French presence here, and perhaps the least obvious, is that of Pernod Ricard, through its ownership of Orlando-Wyndham, one of our largest producers, exporters and owner of the huge, globally successful Jacobs Creek brand.

The French toe hold in Australia was as logical a step as the overseas interests now being developed by our own very large, publicly owned global players: BRL Hardy, Mildara Blass and Southcorp Wines.

Until its acquisition by Fosters Brewing in 1996, Mildara Blass appeared to be focused more on the domestic market than on exports. Under the leadership of Ray King, with strong brands like Yellowglen, Jamiesons Run and Wolf Blass, Mildara Blass consistently set the industry pace for shareholder returns.

King’s cautious approach to exports perhaps reflected a respect for profits not market share. Interviewed for this column some years back, he said that exports would be undertaken only if they yielded as good a return on investment as domestic sales.

King is still at the helm. But under Foster’s ownership we can already sniff a more global focus. Since the Fosters acquisition, Mildara Blass has bought Rothbury Estate, with its valuable vineyards at Cowra, Cellarmaster Wines — a global leader in wine direct marketing — and recently announced plans for new wine brands to be produced in California and Chile.

For the Californian venture, former St Hubert’s (Yarra Valley) wine maker, Adam Marks has been transferred to the Golden State Vintners winery at Monterey. Here — with occasional help from David O’Leary (Mildara’s Clare Valley wine maker and before that red-wine maker at BRL Hardy) — Marks is to make wine for a new label, to be released, initially, only in the American market.

California’s bumper 1997 crop allowed gave the venture a great start and it seems there will be sixty to seventy thousand cases available for the launch later this years. The brand name has not been decide yet, but initial production was predominantly chardonnay and cabernet with a slightly smaller quantity of merlot and a little zinfandel, a red variety widely planted in California but little known here.

There are also plans for an ‘old vines’ zinfandel’ and a reserve cabernet. The story will continue next week.

Copyright © Chris  Shanahan 1998 & 2007

King Valley Victoria part two of two — Brown Bros

Without Brown Bros there may not be a King Valley wine industry today. A seeming permanence on the landscape since 1889, sheer size, wide consumer recognition, an early acceptance of new grape-growing ventures in the south of the valley and apparent prosperity made them the biggest player in the region and keeps them well ahead of competitors in size and public recognition.

Amongst consumers, Brown Bros is one of the most widely recognised wine brands of all. It is also one of only a few wineries established in the nineteenth century to prosper and survive into the 1990s still under family control.

Where the Hardy, Penfold, Seppelt, Lindeman, Gramp, Morris and Tulloch families lost control of their businesses the Browns, along with McWilliams and Tyrrells not only survived the long haul but remained significant mainstream players as well, although each remained intact into the 1990s by a different route.

Until recent times, Brown Bros was a diverse farming operation. Wine making was a major, but not sole focus of the business.

Chief Viticulturist , Mark Walpole, says he joined Brown Bros as a farm manager, but as wine making became the core activity of the family, he concentrated increasingly on vineyard management, learning the trade from Dr Jim Hardy, hands on work and international vineyard tours.

These days, he says, the family farms are leased to allow a one hundred per cent focus on wine making, based on vineyards in the King Valley, Rutherglen and on the Murray River, near Swan Hill.

Like other wineries, the focus is moving rapidly towards the premium end of the market. Over the last few decades, says wine maker Rob Scapin, production has been fairly evenly split between cask and bottles.

Now, all growth is in bottled wine and Scapin says the cask may not exist in another seven years. By that time production will have grown to around 18,000 grape tonnes a year (about 1.3 million dozen bottles) split fairly evenly between whites and reds with a smaller portion given to fortified wines.

By then, Brown Bros hopes to be exporting fifty per cent of its bottled-wine output, double the current level of 25 per cent.

Brown Bros see the trialing of new and different grape varieties as important to its future.

Scapin says the company crushed forty three different wine-grape varieties in 1997 and many of these were bottled separately for tasting and sale through the cellar door facility — one of the biggest in Australia and symbolic of the Browns’ unique approach to wine marketing.

The Browns are now, and for as long as I can remember, have been more concerned with what the drinker wants than with what critics, retailers or show judges think of their wines.

During the seventies and eighties — an era of perennial wine overproduction and subsequent producer-led discounting in Australia — the Browns steadily built a following for their brands by marketing an image direct to the public.

They were almost alone amongst wine producers in driving their own demand rather than relying on the retail trade to create interest through discounting.

They did much of the spade work at cellar door. With Melbourne just a few hours drive away from Milawa, the Hume highway just twenty minutes away and being on the road to the Victorian snowfields, Brown Bros direct sales boomed.

However, cellar door success came not just through location but through a consistent effort to find what the drinker wanted and then providing it.

Brown Bros became the champion of new grape varieties. With the CSIRO they developed tarrango — a new red-grape variety that thrived on the warm Murray and made fruity, soft, easy drinking wines.

It was first sold at cellar door in the seventies. Success there led to increased planting and production. It is now the company’s biggest selling red wine — selling more in the UK than at home.

More recently, the Italian variety, Barbera, made a successful debut at cellar door. Production is now on the increase, and thirteen hectares have been planted at the new Banksdale vineyard on a volcanic ridge in the south west of the King Valley.

Dolcetto seems set to get a guernsey, too, and the Brown Bros don’t give a hoot if the critics scoff. Instead of the traditional Italian dry style Browns have made an extremely sweet red wine. Why? Because cellar door trials showed that significant numbers of cellar door customers wanted a fruity, sweet red without bubbles — something more prestigious sounding and more expensive that Lambrusco.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 1998 & 2007

King Valley Victoria part one of two

Australia’s current vineyard explosion, should it continue as envisaged through to 2025, could add more vines to the continent than were planted in the first two hundred years of white settlement.

The pace of change is too rapid for anyone to accurately monitor in any single region, let alone across the whole continent. A sustained expansion may create a southern Australia somewhat like Italy where vines are planted in dribs and drabs all over — literally a new ‘Enotria’, or land of vines as the Greeks called Etruscan Italy — forging a wine map almost unrecognisable to drinkers of the mid nineties.

In Victoria’s King Valley, the remarkable growth sees not just new vineyards, but new wineries springing up overnight.

During a visit last October, Miranda Wines’ presence was a recently-acquired cow paddock on the Wangaratta-Oxley road, and a press release announcing plans for 60 hectares of vines and a 2000 tonne (150,000 dozen bottles) capacity winery.

Last week, after a pleasant drive across the alps to northern Victoria, I was astonished to see the winery approaching completion in time for the 1998 vintage. There was no sign of grape vines, but word is that about 60 hectares are to be planted on the site this winter.

A few kilometres south, near the village of Moyhu, another large paddock was being prepared for planting by the De Bortoli family, Miranda’s wine-making neighbours from Griffith, NSW; and in the neighbouring Ovens Valley to the north, a consortium of King Valley grape growers and Murray-River-based Kingston Estate Wines, has another large winery under construction with a proposed 1998 crush of 2,500 tonnes (175,000 dozen bottles).

Further south up the valley, on a line of low hills to the west of the King River, Brown Bros are establishing a major new vineyard, ‘Banksdale’ in the Myrrhee sub-district. It sits on thin, red volcanic soil — the weathered remains of a lava flow from Tolmie during the tertiary era.

At 410-486 metres, Banksdale provides a notably cooler grape growing environment than at Brown Bros old Milawa vineyards, on the deep, alluvial Oxley Plains at around 170 metres.

Seventy hectares of vines are already in the ground at Banksdale with another 25 to be planted this winter, giving this single vineyard a potential output of around 70,000 dozen bottles a year — more than the output of the entire Canberra region.

While Banksdale may be bigger than the average King Valley planting, its broad acres are typical for the region.

Where Canberra in its pioneering phase was characterised by tiny winery-vineyard developments, the King Valley seems to have been driven by one large winery — Brown Bros — fed by comparatively large-scale independent grape growers with no original interest in wine making.

Thus, according to the King Valley Grapegrowers Association, there are now about fifty families in the region “dependent on grapes as their primary source of income”.

And the focus on planting has moved away from the warm northern end of the valley to the cool southern end, thanks to he pioneering work of independent grape growers and, later, the establishment of Brown Bros ‘Whitlands’ vineyard at 800 metres above sea level.

Independent growing in the valley was pioneered by Guy Darling and John Leviny. Both established vines in the higher, cooler northern end of the valley in 1970 (between Moyhu and Whitfield).

(Guy Darling’s ‘Koombahla’ vineyard at Whitfield lent its name to a Brown Bros wine for many years but is now used only on Guy’s own wines.)

Brown Bros absorbed most of the region’s grapes in the early days and remains the major player. But there are a number of small wineries in the area (John Gehrig, Avalon, La Cantina and more); Miranda, De Bortoli and Kingston Estate are setting up shop; virtually all of Australia’s major wine makers source wine from the valley; and, increasingly, grape growers are converting part of their crops to wine through contract wine makers — setting the scene for an explosion of King Valley labels.

The Valley — the northern end of it at least — is beautifully situated for tourism, being close to the Hume Highway, the Victorian alps and historic tourist towns like Beechworth. Brown Bros cellar door sales are
reputedly amongst the highest in Australia thanks to a 365 day a year stream of tourists — including a strong ski contingent during winter.

The sites of the new Miranda and Kingston Estate Wineries suggests an eye to passing trade and a big new impetus to regional tourism.

More on the King Valley next week.

Copyright Chris Shanahan 1998 & 2007

Grenach — frivolous, fruity and fun

Grenache, one of the world’s most widely planted red grape varieties, produces delicious but mainly frivolous and fruity wines from Spain, to Sardinia to Southern France to California to Australia.

It can and does make reds of substance, sometimes in its own right but especially in tandem with shiraz, mourvedre or, in Spain, with tempranillo.

In 1996 — at 33,950 tonnes — grenache weighed in as Australia’s third most voluminous red variety, behind shiraz (92,500 tonnes) and cabernet sauvignon (72,330 tonnes).

24,000  of Australia’s 33,950 tonnes came from South Australia. Of that the hot, irrigated vineyards of the Murray contributed 13,500 tonnes, the Barossa Valley 6,000 tonnes and McLaren Vale 3,500 tonnes.

Large areas of old vines in these warm areas survived the swing from fortified wine to table wine and now enjoy a renewed interest as wine makers and drinkers accept grenache as a delightful wine for the warm Australian climate.

Even if most grenache continues to disappear into anonymous, cheap blends, the name appears on an increasing range of wines, many of which are a big step up from vin ordinaire and provide outstanding value and drinking pleasure in our warm climate.

At a random tasting this week of about one hundred cheap and middle-priced Australian reds, a group of grenache and grenache blends stood out as the real value.

Too many of the traditional reds (mainly shiraz, cabernet and cabernet shiraz blends) relied on oak and alcohol for flavour. Some held a fleeting appeal, but after sip or two, the astringent, mean nature showed. It seems grape flavours in red wine now come at a premium.

In contrast the grenache blends, in general, delivered attractive fruit flavours in styles ranging from the light and simple to the firm and solid. A sample of seventeen wines yielded good drinking in the $8-$18 price range.

At $8 (specialling as low as $6.99) Orlando Jacobs Creek Grenache Shiraz 1997 provides a tasty ‘luncheon’ version of the grape. It has the variety’s sweet, floral aroma and a silky, juicy, gentle, refreshing, dry palate. Probably best served lightly chilled and treated like a full-bodied white. Drink now. Do not cellar.

Rosemount Grenache Shiraz 1997 (about $9) continues in the fruity, scrumptious style but offers more depth of flavour than the Jacobs Creek. Fine, silky tannins give it a more ‘purchase’ on the palate. Again, this is one for current drinking and a slight chill probably enhances the delicious ‘musk’ and ‘cherry’ fruit flavours.

Sticking to the ‘fruit-not-oak’ styles, St Hallett Barossa Gamekeepers 1997 ($11), combines grenache, mourvedre and touriga (a Portuguese variety) in a wine of heady perfume and sumptuous, fleshy fruitiness. Once, again serve lightly chilled and polish it all off in time to buy the next vintage. My favourite of this genre.

Another Barossa wine, Peter Lehmann Grenache 1997, holds tremendous appeal, too. It weighs in at a whopping 14.5 per cent alcohol, but the sensuous, spicy-plummy, pure fruit flavours almost hide the alcohol which fights through to give a pleasantly astringent finish. Drink up.

Moving to weightier styles, where oak as well as fruit plays a role, Gramps Barossa Grenache 1995 ($11) delivers rich, round, mouthfilling fruit flavours mingled pleasantly with solid ‘vanilla bean’ oak flavours. This wine is substantially more tannic and grippy than the fruity styles and at about three years of age is probably at its peak.

Yalumba Bush Vine Barossa Valley Grenache 1996 ($16) offers spicy, plummy, mouthfilling fruit flavours cut through with oak flavours and fine, drying tannins. Oak gives the wine a good mouthfeel and finish but fruit remains the main feature.

Richard Hamilton Reserve Grenache Shiraz 1995 takes body and richness to another level, aided by the shiraz component. Its colour, richness, and firm, gripping nature make for good drinking now with red meats, but this may be one to cellar for another two or three years.

Of the solid, oak-matured styles, my highest rating wine was Tatachilla Keystone McLaren Vale Grenache Shiraz 1996 ($13). Everything — from the dense, crimson-tinted colour — to the deep, sweet scent, to the opulent, supple, oakey palate — made it a standout, one to swallow happily over the next two or three years.

From the simple, fruity Jacobs Creek to the substantial, oak-matured Tatachilla these reds are linked by the common thread of delicious grenache fruit flavour. They are wines to quaff happily now or in the near future without too much knitting of the brow or deep thought.

Chateau Shanahan looks forward to putting all these (and more) to the bottle test over the remaining warm months.

Copyright Chris Shanahan 1998 & 2007

1997 — a year in retrospect

It’s been a big year for the Australian wine industry. The second biggest vintage ever fell short of demand, especially in premium red wine. Exports reached an all time high. Domestic consumption, especially of bottled red and white grew strongly. And, in face, of shortage, prices continued to climb.

Premium riesling, so long the bargain of Australian whites, finally caught on, resulting in rationing and higher prices. On the commercial front our larger wine makers moved into off-shore ventures to fully exploit growing global demand. Australian wine-making interests now span the world.

Share prices of listed wine companies reached new heights. New floats (mostly recently Cranswick Estates and Alambie) attracted strong interest. And acquisitions continued, including Southcorp’s purchase of Devil’s Lair in the West and Mildara Blass’s $160 million move into direct marketing
through its purchase of Cellarmaster Wines.

On the retail front, growth of the majors continued with the Coles Myer owned Liquorland’s group move into the Queensland market through the purchase of hotels and attached liquor barns.

And Woolworths-owned Macs liquor launched its Australia-wide ‘Abervale Wine Club’ apparently to counter arch-rival Liquorland’s Vintage Cellars and Fly Buys Wine Clubs, The Australian Wine Society and the numerous wine clubs run by Cellarmaster Wines. All of which is good news for drinkers. There’s
nothing like hot competition to raise service levels and keep a lid on prices.

In Canberra, 1997 brought a legally defensible regional wine boundary after years of debate and negotiation. The boundary starts and finishes at Burrinjuck dam wall after wandering north then east along the Yass and Gunning Shire boundaries to the 149 degree two minute meridian, south to 35 degrees 35 minutes, west to the 149 degree meridian, then north back to the dam wall.

The Canberra wine region, as gazetted, becomes law in mid January 1998, provided no one lodges objections to the proposed boundaries.

Canberra’s other big wine news in 1997 was BRL Hardy’s decision to establish a winery, cellar door facility, regional promotion centre and to foster the planting of 250 hectares of vines within the regional
boundaries.

A government land grant on the corner of Flemington Road and the Federal Highway at Watson has clinched the location of the winery. And when the regional boundary is bedded down, vineyard planning may proceed with more certainty.

1997 will go down as the year the big decisions were made. The future should see Canberra’s wine output increase tenfold by the turn of the millennium, with the possibility of Canberra’s becoming a major
wine-processing centre for grapes planted along the western side of the Great Dividing Range.

Through all this rapid change and price escalation, Australian wineries continued to make ever-better wine. I offer here the Chateau Shanahan annual wine awards for 1997:

Best current-release red: Penfolds Cabernet Sauvignon Bin 707 1994. A fabulous, world-class red still selling for about one third the price of Grange.

Best mature red: Wynns Coonawarra Estate Cabernet Sauvignon 1991. Bottles from Chateau Shanahan and the Anders Josephson Collection confirmed good old black label Wynns one of the great wine bargains of the world.

Best white wine of the year: Penfolds Reserve Bin 95B Chardonnay 1995 . Due for release this year this wonderful Adelaide Hills-McLaren Vale white won three trophies at the Sydney Show and was described later by Chairman of Judges, Len Evans, as ‘a revelation’. (This wine, an Adelaide Hills/McLaren Vale blend, became the first Penfolds Yattarna. Penfolds released its cellar mate, a straight Adelaide Hills blend, and a better wine, in my opinion, as Bin 95A Reserve Chardonnay).

Best mature white : Leo Buring Bin DW B13 Watervale Riesling 1972. Wine maker John Vickery offered this wine in a tasting of distinguished Australian rieslings spanning thirty years.  You can’t buy it now, but the message is that top rieslings are amongst the best whites we make.

Copyright Chris Shanahan 1998 & 2007

Breaking beer’s tribal boundaries

The amount Australians spend on wine each year – around $1.2 billion – seems small beer (sorry) compared to the more than $5 billion we spend on the amber fluid.

Yet beer drinkers take their habit less seriously than wine drinkers do theirs, demolishing oceans of ale with minimal fuss, pretension, or even discussion over its merits.

Despite a plethora of labels that might suggest otherwise, Australian beer drinkers generally stick within a narrow style band that might be summed up as clean, fresh, bland and a touch sweet.

Brand choice, the marketers say, is determined more along tribal lines than by flavour: most beer drinkers will drink what their peer group drinks. Ice beers, a comparatively recent development, are an exception and appear to cross tribal boundaries all across this parched and thirsty continent.

For that reason a six-pack of, say, Hahn Ice, taken into foreign territory may be a safer bet than potential tribal icons such as VB or Tooheys Draught.

Away from the mainstream, there is a growing demand for variety. What the marketers call the premium and imported beer segment is growing at a prodigious rate, but off a small base. Some say this segment may make up, at the most, five per cent of the current market – a still sizeable $250million a year or so.

Again, lagers – albeit with notably more character than mainstream brands – make up the bulk of this market. But there is an increasing variety of beer styles arriving on retail shelves.

While many of these challenge the Aussie lager-conditioned palate, some consumers seem to be in the mood to experiment with and embrace new flavour sensations.

Acknowledging the trend, this year’s annual ‘Sydney Morning Herald’/Age’ ‘Uncorked’, published last Tuesday, devoted two pages to beer reviews by well-known wine critic, Mark Shield.

Shield recommended a truly catholic selection of beers ranging from Foster’s New ‘Extra’ to mainstream international lagers like the German classic, Beck’s, to the beautifully named Belgian ‘Delirium Tremens’ and full-blooded 9 per cent alcohol Chimay ales, brewed by Trappist monks.

I was particularly interested to read Shield’s reviews as I’d just returned to Canberra after four days’ judging at this year’s Liquorland Australian International Beer Awards in Ballarat.

Now Ballarat may seem a strange place to taste 400 beers in mid winter. But it is the only place in Australia offering University courses in brewing. And it is senior lecturer, Rob Greig who, with the help of the Royal Victorian Agricultural Society, has very quickly made this event the world’s third biggest beer competition.

Originally, the awards were seen as a forum for small makers, but Greig and his team adapted the awards to accommodate mainstream as well as exotic brews as the number of entries exploded. This year the ratio of entrants was 34 small to 41 large breweries.

Last year, when I attended as observer there were 288 entries. This year the number leapt 51 per cent to 436 and, according to Greig, another hundred were turned away after arriving too late.

Forty-five breweries from 24 countries entered beers for judging and the number of international competitors leapt 73 per cent to 296 – a sign of how seriously this Australian event is now being taken.

Entries came from Australia, Korea, Singapore, Germany, Thailand, Canada, New Zealand, Japan, Vietnam, England, India, Scotland, China, Sri Lanka, Mauritius, Indonesia, Tonga, Czechoslovakia, Hong Kong, Philippines, Malta, USA, South Africa and Vanuatu.

To do justice to 331 bottled and 105 draught beers over last Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and Monday Greig assembled 11 judges, working as a single panel on small categories and splitting into two for larger ones.

The judges were Tim Cooper (Coopers Brewery, Adelaide), Roger Bussell (Joe White Maltings, Adelaide), Bill Taylor (Castlemaine, Brisbane), Paul Schrader (Eumundi, Brisbane), Johann Steenberg (South African Breweries, Johannesburg) Peter Manders (Carlton and United Breweries, Melbourne), Barry Axon (Dominion Breweries, Auckland), Richard Benwell (Boags Brewery, Tasmania), Rob Rich (Quest International, New Zealand, myself, and chief judge Colin Dowzer (Brewing consultant, Melbourne).

The beers were split into like classes across open, small brewery, specialty and international sections. And so, systematically, one beer at a time in unmarked glasses, the panels judged lagers, ales, stouts, and wheat beers.

We judged everything from the lightest, blandest low-alcohol lagers to an extraordinary, non-sparkling triple bok that poured like licorice, smelled like Vegemite and weighed in at a colossal 17 per cent alcohol.

But as we knew the beers only by class definition and randomly generated entry numbers we will have to wait until later this month for the Award winners to be announced. I will report the judges’ verdict on June 29, along with comments from my own notes.

Copyright © Chris Shanahan 1997 & 2007